Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep , clearly notable. ... discospinster _talk 02:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to consist of its own article. Anitta Pitta (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. Article is well-sourced and clearly passes WP:WEB. (Also, I note that I'm a former Wikia employee and am disclosing that COI.) --Sykes83 (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per Sykes83. Clearly a notable service. Shellwood (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.