Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wim Cool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wim Cool

Wim Cool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from one incident, which is already discussed on the 2011 Senate elections page, this local politician is not notable Dajasj (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I'm not sure, I feel like since he's a senator, he could potentially become notable in the future. However, he doesn't meet the criteria for notability at the moment. WiinterU 16:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@WinterU:, he has never been a senator, he also isn't a member of the Provincial States anymore. Dajasj (talk) 16:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, well I misread it on accident. I hereby change my vote to Delete. WiinterU 17:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:N and is already discussed on the 2011 election page. Brenae wafato (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wim Cool, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.