Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winjit technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Winjit technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable refs. Fails WP:GNG . The refs confirm it exists but nothing more.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   12:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Software company article of unclear notability, lacking significant independent coverage. Refs provided are incidental mentions and non-notable awards. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 13:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (draft/userfy if needed) - I'm not familiar with those awards and my searches found nothing convincingly good here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment there exists a copy/paste draft here, which has been declined. If there is a decision to draftify, strongly recommend a histmerge to maintain attribution. Primefac (talk) 09:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.