Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winston McCall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Consensus is against deletion. Redirect discussion can take place elsewhere. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Winston McCall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is nothing more than a single sentence, created by a fan of the subject's band. The subject likely meets notability, but with such an extreme stub a redirect may be more suitable. Prior PROD was removed. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect into band article. -- The Anome (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:39, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect unless a pile of content shows up - David Gerard (talk) 14:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Mild keep - it's just substantive enough to keep now - David Gerard (talk) 18:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subject of numerous interviews, generally as spokesperson of main band, but enough to be notable.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to his band. Nothing significant independent of his band. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.