Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WireCash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WireCash

WireCash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a non-notable company. The article has 15 references, but not one of them is independent - they're all either from the company's website (1, 2, 3), from one of their business partners' websites (4, 6, 8, 11, 14), or a press release (5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15). Checking Google and Google News just brought up more press releases.
Also, the editor that created the article and has never edited anything else also has the company's name as part of their user name, so there's that. Egsan Bacon (talk) 23:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 02:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 02:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 02:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WireCash, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.