Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wireless tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1 (non-admin closure) -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 18:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wireless tower

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A solution looking for a problem. No incoming links, the outgoing links are all quite distinct (but no "primary" place to redirect). Bad dab. Primefac (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I drove past the Stokenchurch BT Tower yesterday, marvelling at its positioning on top of the Chilterns so that it has a line of sight to both London and the Oxford plain. That's a telecommunication tower and there are variety of such towers used for wireless broadcasting and communication. The phrase in question is used to describe them in numerous sources and so it is appropriate that it should be a blue link. For example, the Congressional record says "In July 1976 a tablet was unveiled at Shoreham, Long Island, on the site where Tesla's wireless tower used to stand." Our article for that is entitled Wardenclyffe Tower and so readers may naturally need some help in finding it. Andrew D. (talk) 17:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - again, a sensible and helpful dab page. In general pages like this should not be brought to AfD. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 21:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A very obvious navigational need for disambiguation, or arguably a set index. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This set index/DAB page serves a useful purpose. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.