Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizo Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wizo Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable production company with no coverage, at least under this name that I can find. Fails WP:GNG CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- was created as a promotional article for non-notable company--Rusf10 (talk) 04:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom for the lack of sources. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 14:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.