Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's Defence Forces

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kurdistan Free Life Party. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Defence Forces (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to demonstrate Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Merge with Kurdistan Free Life Party. Pahlevun (talk) 08:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep sources from a quick Google search include [1], [2], [3]. SSTflyer 10:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 10:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The sources above are not covering the subject deeply. They are only passing mentions about them being offshoot of PKK and PJAK and notability is not inherited, it is not enough to prove notability. Pahlevun (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect name to Kurdistan Free Life Party, but otherwise fails as a stand alone stub as not notable in and of itself. Kierzek (talk) 13:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: Best to avoid recreating a redlink and the group may eventually qualify as a spinoff. For now, could be a plausible search phrase. Montanabw^(talk) 01:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Kierzek and comments on preceding article. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: to Kurdistan Free Life Party as it doesn't seem to have enough coverage to warrant a separate article. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.