Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wool E. Woola
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 08:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Wool E. Woola
- Wool E. Woola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, self published, moonbow press set up by author. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The book looks cute, but unfortunately it just hasn't received any coverage to show where it passes notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. I am getting nothing on it. But it does look cute. HullIntegrity\ talk / 11:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.