Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Working in Partnership Programme (WiPP) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Working in Partnership Programme (WiPP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability asserted, no sourcing found. All links in article are primary Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• keep This is really a stub with a lot of cites, and I've marked it as such. GBook hits reveal extensive 3rd party discussion of the program. Mangoe (talk) 15:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• merge to General medical services , the uK organization of which this is a minor component.It does need some coverage, but it would be better within the general article. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.