Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Class Manufacturing:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

World Class Manufacturing: (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meaningless term, ised as a general superlative. To the extent it does have a meaning, the relevant policy is NOT DICTIONARY. DGG ( talk ) 08:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per DGG. -NottNott|talk 09:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The article is a WP:DICDEF that tries to be an encyclopedic article. Original research is present in a synthyness way with the statement "many publications could be considered as advancing the cause of world-class manufacturing" which is in the "Concept" part of the article and extends into the "see also". I am dubious with the addition of Lean and Six Sigma manufactoring methodologies to linking a manufacturing process/methodology with a manufacturing title. - Pmedema (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. per nom.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  22:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.