Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide wave of action (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide wave of action

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated for deletion last year with little input, closed as no consensus. The keep rationale was "keep for now," and we now know that this never actually happened. More to the point, there aren't any sources about it to build an article on (which we'd expect from something that never occurred). Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons I gave when I initiated the previous deletion discussion. It was weird that the two other contributions to that discussion leaned toward merging or redirecting, without indicating what the article would be merged with or redirected to. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:BALL should have applied at the time, and if "Wikipedia is not a repository of events that might have been" was not so self-evidently obvious that someone had actually written it up, I'd quote it here. ~Excesses~ (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At least based on current content, the article provides no evidence that this event actually took place. All the sources appear to have been added to the article before the scheduled start of the event. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination statement and subsequent comments. No credible sources to verify the event actually took place.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Should probably have been CRYSTALLED at the time, but as it did not happen, it did not receive coverage or have an impact. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Detele/redirect as creator. It didn't pan out and some of the media reports appear to have been manipulated. Juno (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.