Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wynn's propulsion effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. It's not gonna be any less of a hoax if we keep debating it for several days. DS (talk) 13:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wynn's propulsion effect

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have to agree with the editor who tagged this as a hoax. The one single reference has little to do with the purported subject. It contains nothing about "Wynn", "propulsion", "thermodynamic", or "peers"; and is not about any effects of social isolation. Google searches return only Wikipedia mirrors. It appears to be nonexistent on Google Scholar. [1] The article was created by an account who only ever made a single edit - creating this article. [2] Appears to be something made up one day. If this is a hoax, it lasted for nearly 8 years. -Crossroads- (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -Crossroads- (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Hoax - I agree with the nominator. The one cited reference has nothing to do with a "Wynn propulsion effect" and was clearly added in hopes that nobody would check it and thereby lend credibility to the hoax. May His Shadow Fall Upon You ^Talk 14:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. XOR'easter (talk) 17:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as the tagger. Note that the creator has 'sock' is his/her username. Abductive (reasoning) 23:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:BOLLOCKS, in addition to those above. Bearian (talk) 15:53, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a hoax. A Wynn-Wynn outcome. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:34, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.