Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Ray Dog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bertelsmann Music Group#Production music. So Why 07:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

X-Ray Dog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:GNG. I was unable to locate significant coverage of the subject outside of the sources already provided. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bertelsmann_Music_Group#Production_music There aren't enough sources for an independent article, although there's a bit of coverage of its purchase by BMG[1]; this purchase means it's unlikely to become more notable in the future. I added a section to Bertelsmann Music Group on the company's production music interests. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & redirect name only to Bertelsmann_Music_Group#Production_music. Not independently notable & no need to preserve the history which is strictly promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.