Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XHTOL-FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of radio stations in the State of Mexico. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

XHTOL-FM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG, only source is the Mexican equivlent of the FCC. Neutralhomer • Talk • 17:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC) 17:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I have been working on, but unable to handle due to other pressures, a plan that would likely cull hundreds of Mexican radio station pages. Sourcing of the kind needed to pass increased GNG pressures is just too low. The ATD will be a state list redirect, in this case List of radio stations in the State of Mexico. Earlier this year, I added the remaining state lists we did not previously have. As proof that this has been on my mind for more than six months, User:Sammi Brie/Mexico radio culling. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If there are other articles you wish to add from your "cull" list, now is the time. Unfortunately, just because of "other pressures" (which I do sympathize with) exist, doesn't give this or other articles that don't meet GNG a reprieve. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:17, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of radio stations in the State of Mexico: if even the article creator feels there is not the level of GNG-supporting significant coverage to retain an article (even for a 55-year-and-counting station), that's never a good sign. An {{R to list entry}} may well be the best we can do. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.