Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xplorer²

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xplorer² (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see how this piece of software meets WP:GNG. Most search results are download or aggregator websites. sst✈ 17:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 17:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Just found something from Lifehacker. I'm going to keep looking. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 19:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good find, but a single Lifehacker review is not enough for establishing notability. sst✈ 05:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Second Lifehacker review: [1], and one from BetaNews, which I am taking to RSN. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 22:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • RSN came up empty. We source it in a few articles, but maybe it's not good enough. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 18:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Some links at News and browsers but perhaps nothing for a better article. Draft and userfy if needed, SwisterTwister talk 06:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment xplorer2 is a popular windows file manager actively developed since 2004. It is easy in the top 5 windows file managers checking Alexa rank or whatever else you might want to consider. If you remove its article you must remove 95% of software articles on Wikipedia. umeca74 (t/c) 12:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Umeka74: Are there any big, popular sites that post about it? I mean in terms of most of this. Anything this big will probably do. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 01:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep All this discussion started because someone who hasn't heard of xplorer2 before and cannot do a google search for "xplorer2 review" to answer its own question, and considers lifehacker to be inferior, wants the Wikipedia article removed. I believe there were enough countering voices and croud democracy should now win :) umeca74 (t/c) 05:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This my favorite file explorer. It is powerful, important and certainly notable. OlavN (talk) 08:28, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Has multiple reviews from Lifehacker and one from CNET here, passing GNG. Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 20:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.