Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yan Logic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yan Logic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be original research Oscarthecat (talk) 07:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yan Logic is a term that is catching on in Singapore used for people that create their own logic. Something like the Dunning-Kruger effect. Krazio (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Used here but unlikely in the sense that the article says. Apart from that I can't find any mention of the term anywhere, so it fails WP:GNG. @Krazio: if it's catching on you must have some sources to add? Who said it was like the Dunning-Kruger effect? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Sailor: alright understood. will do more research before creating articles. My Apologies. Krazio (talk) 12:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Couldn't find the use of this term on my searches. Doesn't pass the general notability criteria.—UY Scuti ^Talk 14:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Logic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.