Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yash Moradiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Legoktm (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yash Moradiya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not pass any notability guideline. AmirŞah 17:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)(sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, India, and Gujarat. AmirŞah 17:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I don't think we consider Guinness World Records notable, so we fall back to GNG. I have found this on UPI [1] and a few other mentions. I think if we had one more RS in a newspaper for example, with the Guinness site we'd be at GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sourcing in the article (Hindi, English, Thai, Vietnames, Hungarian), as well as additional sources I find through Google-based searches indicate that subject passes WP:GNG. [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Yandeńo (talk) 02:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)(sock strike- MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]
• Keep: Sources of the article are from multiple language and from multiple countries which makes him to pass WP:GNG. LordVoldemort728 (talk) 06:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The coverage of this individual is more than sufficient for GNG. The fact he actively sought out this attention and thus is high-profile, and the fact the coverage is so extensive in multiple reliable sources, disqualifies WP:BLP1E from being a barrier to inclusion. —Sirdog (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:GNG, because of receiving multiple WP:SIGCOV.KimOvik (talk) 23:31, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Due to WP:BIO1E. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.