Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yer-sub
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Tengrism. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yer-sub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although there are some sources such as http://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/64/14_Yerzhanova%20et%20al.pdf I am not sure there are enough to show notability for a stand-alone article. As an alternative to deletion maybe merge into Tengriism? Chidgk1 (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Religion, Central Asia, and Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Merge : per nom.--Gabriel (……?) 11:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tengriism is a Redirect, not an appropriate Merge target page. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh you right. Gabriel (……?) 05:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Gabriel601 I don’t know the subject so you should say whether merging to Tengrism is suitable as I don’t really know merge or delete which is better? Chidgk1 (talk) 05:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh you right. Gabriel (……?) 05:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Tengriism is a Redirect, not an appropriate Merge target page. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Tengrism - the current stub has one external link, which is tantamount to original research. This is not exclusionary of either a merger or later Re-creation. Dicta: This religion or belief system is quite ancient, and is linguistically interesting, because it might point to a larger language family in Asia. Bearian (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.