Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogesh Bhateja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G5. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yogesh Bhateja

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person seems non-notable and WP:PROMOTIONAL with references that are interview/sponsored type in nature. — Amkgp 💬 18:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp 💬 18:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp 💬 18:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Amkgp 💬 18:45, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete very much an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wholly promotional. Fails WP:BASIC. Serving notable client or celebrities doesn't make anyone noble. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. RationalPuff (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above, feels like possible paid editing. Ravensfire (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. Fitness coaches and the like are not automatically notable by themselves. Bearian (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.