Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Pyro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Young Pyro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a recording artist who lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:23, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The artist has been an independent artist until recently but he has been brought up in many different reputable sources including The Source, JamSphere, Genius, HotNewHipHop, and The Daily Loud. He is a verified spotify artist, his vevo account has been verified, his twitter is going through the verification process now. The artist has his own website. The artist has 1 album and an EP out that was released on iTunes, Spotify, and Tidal. He just recently signed a deal with Ruby Recordings. There are over 15 reputable sources/links on the artists wikipedia page. According to WP:MUSICBIO This artist meets the criterion which includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media. He has reputable online versions of print media. — Olympus722 —Preceding undated comment added 15:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Disagree with the above comments that the published sources (The Source, JamSphere, Genius, HotNewHipHop, and The Daily Loud) are significant. They each openly solicit editorial content from artists wishing to promote themselves, rendering these publications/websites non-independent. The rest are user generated, which includes getting ones music on i-tunes, Spotify, etc. All if it proves existence, not notability. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There are a lot of sources that shows the artist exists, but none that show why he is Notable. --Darth Mike^(talk) 17:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.