Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young and in the Way
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 02:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Young and in the Way (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing on this page but a discography and some obvious promotional text. And the band does not seem to meet the basic guidelines for WP:NOTABILITY Blackmetalskinhead (talk) 02:10, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Speed keep – A poorly written article ≠ not notable. Young and in the Way has been featured or reviewed by several major music publications such as AllMusic, Pitchfork, Exclaim!, Revolver, MetalSucks, The AV Club, BrooklynVegan and I'm positive if I dig through my stack of Decibel magazines, I'll find a full-page profile in there somewhere. The band also received some minor news coverage for an incident involving spilling a ton of blood during a live performance.[1][2][3][4]. These sources weren't hard to find either. Per WP:BEFORE, nominators are expected to conduct at least some research into whether or not a subject is notable before nominating. Fezmar9 (talk) 02:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The sources found by Fezmar9 show that these guys meet WP:BAND. — sparklism hey! 06:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.