Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yousef Erakat (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nomination has been countered with sources that demonstrate the subject's notability, as per WP:BASIC. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yousef Erakat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consists of nothing more than an infobox and an introduction. Picture is copyrighted and will be deleted. No notability WP:ENT. Rayukk (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - This YouTuber is known for his social experiments. Here's a few sources: 1, and 2. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the sources provided above, as well as the outcome of the previous AfD and the sources provided there, as well as WP:NTEMP. Deadbeef 21:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I'll admit the article needs a tidy up but as everyone knows WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP, Anyway there's plenty of sources out there [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] so clearly passes WP:ENT as well as WP:GNG, I assume WP:BEFORE wasn't even followed seeing as I've found 12 sources which took what 5 minutes..... –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.