Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zac Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that this passes WP:GNG (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 ^talk 00:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zac Brooks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Offseason and/or practice squad member only duffbeerforme (talk) 10:39, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Passes WP:GNG in my opinion. Also he's currently on the practice squad and could be promoted any time. Seems too soon for this AFD.--Yankees10 16:31, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep "Offseason and/or practice squad member only" doesn't means he's not notable. He passes GNG. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:27, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Meets WP:GNG. – Michael (talk) 20:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly achieved notability from college play and passes WP:GNG. Per logic in WP:ABELINCOLN, not playing in the NFL does not equate to deletion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WikiOriginal-9's sources as a WP:GNG pass. Ejgreen77 (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes WP:GNG per sources found by WikiOriginal-9. Cbl62 (talk) 16:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.