Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Knight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Although HP can be an RS, there is consensus here that even counting that there is not enough significant coverage to meet WP:N. Rlendog (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zack Knight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced biography of a living person. No indication of notability; Google News show just enough coverage to verify that he exists, but no detailed reports about him or his work. I could find no evidence that he created "a huge buzz in mainstream / Asian media" as the article alleges. Huon (talk) 20:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I, too, was only able to find the HuffPost article, and I assume HP isn't generally considered a RS. Hopefully, he'll gain more attention and will be added when there are sources to be referenced. LaMona (talk) 05:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Knight, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.