Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaeden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zaeden

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:37, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Easily meets WP:GNG. There are more than a dozen good profile pieces in reliable sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets WP:BASIC/WP:GNG per a review of available sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sufficient coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 07:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete articles on musicians must meet our more stringent requirements for musician notability, which are not met here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – If a subject meets the main General notability guideline, it is not required for them to meet secondary notability guidelines. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is definitely enough coverage to establish notability, in this instance. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 21:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG.Clearly referenced as per available sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.