Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZappLight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ZappLight

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Founded two years ago and with minimal press, not seeing how this can pass WP:NCORP. Edwardx (talk) 10:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Yet another spam entry created likely by paid editor(s) based on press-releases and like. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 11:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. Most of the articles write about the product, not the company. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺13:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.