Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeroads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:17, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zeroads

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. I found one single-paragraph blurb in PCWorld reviewing it, no other RS. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 19:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 19:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 19:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. PCworld paragraph mentioned by nom doesn't meet threshold of significant coverage, and a search did not turn up any additional RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 19:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At first I thought perhaps a merge into FBM Software would be in order, but it is not even clear the company as a whole is notable. If you look at its "in the news" page for example, the last activity was in 2005. It was supposedly based in San Francisco, but could not find any mention at all in the San Francisco Business Journal, which would normally cover any significant company. The only link given in this article went dead over two years ago, see this archive W Nowicki (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.