Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoya Akhtar's Next

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zoya Akhtar. Merging can be performed from article history with proper attribution. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zoya Akhtar's Next

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filming has not begin yet,So no reason to be a an article now. ---zeeyanwiki ^discutez05:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

REDIRECT, partial MERGE temporarily to director Zoya Akhtar. The nom is somewhat incorrect in stating "no reason to be a an article now", as occasional exceptions are allowed. Point here being that policy tells us the future events may indeed be spoken of if well and properly sourced and not containing original research. We do have the Zoya Akhtar article and the topic of her next film project has been spoken about in multiple independent sources for many months,[1] and it it is clarified at WP:NFF that "until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available." The redirect target IS available. If we had no place to reasonable redirect or merge, then a separate article would be worth consideration under both policy and guideline. See examples of similar situations. Allow undeletion or recreation once the beginning of principle filming is confirmed.Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Not sure about whether it will be in 2014 or elsewhere.That's the reason i consider it to be deleted. Thanx---zeeyanwiki ^discutez06:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It could begin filming next week... or begin in 3 years... but I am not suggesting a keep either...only illustrating that under WP:PRESERVE we have ways to handle articles on planned events that meet the WP:GNG (through being discussed in detail in numerous reliable sources), even when they might not (yet) merit their own articles. Which is why I offered a LINK to examples of similar situations that protected histories while still serving to enlighten a reader about a sourcable topic. A wish that it be deleted is to be considered against applicable policy and guideline. 11:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.}

Actually we had deleted some articles previously which had the same scenario and reason.So that's why i considered it but as per your suggestion and links,we need to follow other way.So,please do it.Thanx for that---zeeyanwiki ^discutez13:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.