Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zuggtmoy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zuggtmoy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article still fails to establish notability. The previous AfD was a joke where the provided sources literally were just the character's name once or twice with not even any further discussion or context. None were used in the article after due to the fact that they provided no relevant context. TTN (talk) 12:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. The sources in the last AfD were not about the character, but the game they appear in._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources provided in the previous AfD are not enough to establish the notability of the page's subject, as they are nothing but trivial mentions. Not a very active user (talk) 14:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Demon (Dungeons & Dragons), where it is mentioned in context. 1,320 pageviews in the past 30 days gives evidence that this is a plausible search term. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 01:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This one actually did bring about more results from secondary sources than most D&D related fictional characters when I was doing searches, but actually looking through them proved that none of them were substantial. They ranged from just listing her name as being a character/creature in an upcoming adventure book, to literally just have a picture of her with no context or discussion. So, like many of the myriad of other minor D&D characters, it lacks the reliable, secondary sources that discuss her in any way that would establish notability. Rorshacma (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to Demon (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.