Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 April 3

April 3

Nigerian military coup categories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 12:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Caps fix. Clunky name. HandsomeFella (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Caps fix. Clunky name. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Caps fix. Clunky name. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Caps fix. Clunky name. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Caps fix. Clunky name. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Several reasons. Caps fix. Putting "participants" last makes the name clunky. Align with article name. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Songs written by Hostyle Gospel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Songs are written by people, not by people who are then associated together in some other way. Making categories of songwriters by band member affiliation is a huge headache and not at all helpful to navigation. Previous discussions include The Bee Gees and The Miracles and Lady Antebellum. I would have no objection to the category being split between the named writers. Richhoncho (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Richhoncho Do you have a problem with me? You didn't have to say mean things about people's articles. What I was trying to contribute to Wikipedia writers was a list to help in the future in case they wanted to look up information about this group. I was not trying to create a "huge headache". I felt what you said was very disrespectful and I hope you don't talked like this to other Wikipedia writers. Keywhy (talk) 05:47, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have a problem with songwriting categories by group, especially marketing terms, which Hostyle Gospel is. If you had created Category Hostyle Gospel songs instead I would have had no problem with that category. Please read WP:AGF. --Richhoncho (talk) 07:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Richhoncho Keep in mind, I'm new to Wikipedia and everyone isn't as experience as you are. I didn't know about marketing terms, so please next time take it easy on newbies. I will create the appropriate categories for groups. Keywhy (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Keywhy (category creator) has moved all the entries from this category to Category:Hostyle Gospel songs. There is no reason why this category can't be speedied. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Language maps & Maps of languages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/rename/split to Category:Linguistic maps and Category:Images of linguistic maps. – Fayenatic London 16:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Language maps to with Category:Maps of languages
Nominator's rationale: Merge. These two categories appear to be intended for the same content, with File:Extensió del català als Pirineus Orientals.svg in both and three items exclusively in each. OwenBlacker (Talk) 17:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scripps newspapers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: split to Category:Journal Media Group and rename to Category:Journal Media Group newspapers. – Fayenatic London 16:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All of Scripps' newspapers are now owned by Journal Media Group, so this category can be repurposed as its own. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question: wouldn't Category:Journal Media Group newspapers be better? HandsomeFella (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
JMG still has some other holdings so I would lean toward the corporate name, I'm not opposed to this alternate rename though. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Affective games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to category:Affective computing. – Fayenatic London 17:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only contains Category:Affective video games. Unnecessary. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support/Expanded Proposal Take this category and Category:Affective video games and upmerge them all to Category:Affectivity, then rename the target category Category:Affectation to match the main article, Affectation. This seems like a possible emerging technology that doesn't justify a whole tree (at least yet). @Qwertyus: If you agree with this, let me know and I'll tag the other two categories. RevelationDirect (talk) 11:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2012 phenomenon theorists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 12:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "Theorist" as a WP:LABEL implies work with a coherent academic discipline. These are people who believed in the 2012 phenomenon, so the proper term is "2012 phenomenon believer". jps (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category: Years in Greenlandic sport(s)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Category:Greenlandic sport(s) by year and merge the others to Category:20XX in Danish sport and Category:20XX in Greenland. MER-C 13:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting:
Category:2014 in Greenlandic sport
Category:Greenlandic sport by year
Category:2016 in Greenlandic sports
Category:Greenlandic sports by year
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:SMALLCAT; Propose deleting as there are only two entries (and no other possibles) for the 21st century; the two entries would then be included in Category:2014 in Greenland and Category:2016 in Greenland. However if retained perhaps use Greenlandic sports not Greenlandic sport as is usual for North America (America, Canada, Mexico), although Greenland is a dependency of Denmark. Hugo999 (talk) 13:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1st-millennium BC establishments in the United Kingdom of Israel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Ancient Israel and Judah. – Fayenatic London 17:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose delete Category:1st-millennium BC establishments in the United Kingdom of Israel
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:NARROWCAT and WP:SMALLCAT, the scope is only two generations in very ancient history, necessarily leading to very little content. No upmerge needed since the one child category is sufficiently parented already. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

10th-century Czech people‎

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (The word "merge" below appears to be a copy/paste error.) – Fayenatic London 17:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, C2C to Category:10th century in Bohemia and Category:15th-century Bohemian people, though not C2C to Category:11th-century Czech people. Prefer Bohemian over Czech, since Bohemia was the contemporary name of the country. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category: 9th century in Bohemia‎

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only one article. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bohemian princes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:NONDEF. Some people in this category became Bohemian monarch later on, so that Bohemian monarch is their defining characteristic instead of Bohemian prince, while for most people in this category Bohemian prince was just a formal title hardly worth mentioning. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but heavily purge. Most of the people are more notable as Austrian princes/rulers, and should be categorised as members of the Archducal house of Austria. Others were kings of Bohemia and should be cartegorised as such. However this will leave a small residue, who should be here - unless someone can suggest an appropriate target for them to be merged to.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_3&oldid=1083677965"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 April 3, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.