Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 August 16

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Mixels (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: This category is only populated by one target and no indication that there will be any other entries. Delete as an unnecessary category. Safiel (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- One item categories are a waste of space. This is about a cartoon TV series. If it were expanded, the extra articles would probably end off being merged back to the main article. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Combine Discussion with Earlier Nomination because these categories are inherently tied. Please provide your input at the currently open nomination. The closing administrator for that discussion may wish to leave additional time for a full discussion of these added categories. (Note: Procedural closure by a non-administrator.) RevelationDirect (talk) 04:15, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Academic journals published in France (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: as per Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July_28#Category:Academic_journals_by_country_of_publication fgnievinski (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July_28#Category:Academic journals by country of publication. Thanks. fgnievinski (talk) 01:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment @Fgnievinski: In the past, when we've expanded nominations, we've added the additional categories to the existing nomination with underlines so it's clear it wasn't in the original nomination. I think that's a matter of custom more than procedure but it may be less confusing than having cross-references here. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @RevelationDirect: Thanks for the heads-up; I've listed (underlined) the expanded nominations in the main nomination: [1]. fgnievinski (talk) 04:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Academic journals published in Australia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: as per Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July_28#Category:Academic_journals_by_country_of_publication fgnievinski (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July_28#Category:Academic journals by country of publication. Thanks. fgnievinski (talk) 01:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Academic journals published in India (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: as per Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July_28#Category:Academic_journals_by_country_of_publication fgnievinski (talk) 01:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July_28#Category:Academic journals by country of publication. Thanks. fgnievinski (talk) 01:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.