Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 19

September 19

Electors of the Palatinate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge Category:Electoral Princes of the Palatinate to Category:Electors of the Palatinate; other proposal withdrawn. It sounds like further work on the categorization is possible. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Princes of the Palatinate‎ to Category:Electors of the Palatinate
  • Propose merging Category:Electoral Princes of the Palatinate to Category:Electors of the Palatinate
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:OVERLAPCAT, all three categories are about electors of the Palatinate. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • In principle Merge but purge -- the target should be limited to the head of the family with the title Elector. We are going to need a category for other members of the family, such as Prince Maurice and Prince Rupert of the Rhine (Ruprecht), which are currently in one of the categories, as is one of a juvenile branch who was Duke of Simmern, but apparently left no male heir, so that his duchy reverted to the senior branch. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/Keep As the last comment shows, they are not the same thing. But we don't need 2 categories for electors. Peterkingiron, why do we need to do anythingmore, and de-categorize the non-Elector princes? Johnbod (talk) 03:49, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we need a category for members of the family who were not electors. German princely states were in principle divisible between sons, but the office of Elector was not. We need a category for other members of the princely family, unless we have one already. It could be that Category:Counts Palatine of the Rhine and/or Category:House of Palatinate-Simmern are adequately covering this; if so, we probably need no more. Category:House of Wittelsbach is much too large and needs containerising. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Imperial valleys

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, not a defining characteristic. Also there is no article about it, try this: Imperial Valley. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:57, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Electorate of the Palatinate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, the name of the category suggests it is about history, but the content is just current German cities. (Note: we do have real history categories about the Palatinate, see nomination below.) Marcocapelle (talk) 16:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete I considered listifying but there seems to be a navbox already. Mangoe (talk) 23:51, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename to Category:Populated places in the Electoral Palatinate. This is a legitimate means of categorising them, unless it would in fact be a duplicate of some other category, based on present or later geographic status. There possibly ought to be separate categories for the Rhenish Palatinate and the Upper Palatinate, two portions of then elector's territory some distance from each other. Note: "palatinate" alone is ambiguous: Lancashire and Cheshire were counties palatinate in England. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:History of the Electoral Palatinate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:History of the Palatinate (region). Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:History of the Electoral Palatinate to Category:History of the Palatinate
Nominator's rationale: rename, as this category has some broader content, it also contains articles of small spin-off states of the Electoral Palatinate, as well as the history of the Palatinate after the Electoral Palatinate ceased to exist. Articles that are really about the history of the Electoral Palatinate itself are better off in Category:Electoral Palatinate. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC) Marcocapelle (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- Palatinate (by itself is ambiguous: the English counties of Cheshire and Lancashire were (or are) counties palatinate, which had different administrative arrangements from the rest of England. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Women writers for children

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The reason is that it will follow the convention of the parent category Category:Children's writers and sibling categories, e.g. Category:Quaker children's writers‎. Honestly, Bodhi (talk) 07:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People of the Wars of Liège

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete; could be re-created if there are articles to add beyond just the heads of state. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:09, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per actual content, it's pretty useless to create a "People of War" category for just the heads of state of the war parties involved. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:JogiAsad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 19:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Categories such as this one do not apply to non-mainspace content, including userpages. Sardr8 (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Creator's rationale: category:JogiAsad is used for the purpose of collecting all my userpage's subpages into a one place.Jogi 007 (talk) 05:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Jogi don, a built in function to find all your subpages is Special:PrefixIndex. All your subpages are at Special:PrefixIndex/User:Jogi don. -- GB fan 13:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Military bases and facilities to installations 2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_November_12#Military_bases_and_facilities decided on the merge of all 'Military facilities' and 'Military bases' categories to 'Military installations,' for clarity. However not all the hundreds of subcategories were listed in the original nomination. At Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_11#Category:Military_facilities_of_the_United_States_in_Germany, a speedy CfR was recommended, but discussion at User talk:Armbrust#Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 April 11#Category:Military facilities of the United States in Germany revealed that some users believed that a speedy CfR was inappropriate. Thus I am starting to list the remaining categories as a mass but non-speedy CfR (see the previous listing at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_June_21#US_military_bases_and_facilities_to_installations). Your assistance in closing off this long-running matter is appreciated. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Surface chemistry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: For consistency with the name of the main article, Surface science. RockMagnetist(talk) 00:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_19&oldid=1074815734"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 September 19, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.