Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 12

June 12

Category:People from Garden, Michigan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Small one-county community with just 2 entries. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is a very small locality with just 220 residents. Very limited possibility of expansion, does not aid in navigation and and makes sense to upmerge. AusLondonder (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support this is what the 'notable people' section on a city/geography article is for; and where the list is long, it is typically instantiated as a list rather than as a category. I'll add a 'notable people' section to the Garden, Michigan article momentarily. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProjects participating in Wikipedia 1.0 assessments

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Assessments are no longer "Wikipedia 1.0 assessments". This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_17#Category:Wikipedia_1.0_assessments. Editors may be able to suggest a better alternative. – Fayenatic London 20:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:SM Seaside City Cebu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category with just two entries. One of which is a cancelled project. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ammazing World Records:Research Achievement

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under various names Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 06:09, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Research Achievement,Ammazing World Records

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under this name and Category:Ammazing World Records Research Achievement and Category:Ammazing World Records:Research Achievement. Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 05:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Who is Who of Indian Writers(online)/search

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Part of a user's self-serving set of categories, templates and drafts. Populated only by his draft article. Speedied multiple times under this name and Category:Sahitya Akademi:Who is Who of Indian Writers. Has been been told more than once not to create new categories for his draft article, and not to use cats in draft articles. Meters (talk) 05:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Drawings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only one or two articles per category. The nominated categories have all been created by the same editor User:Hocimi of whom some more Dutch history categories have been nominated in the past weeks. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scholars of Dutch history

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ℯxplicit 00:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge two categories with overlapping scope. This is another Hocimi creation. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:We Got Married contestants

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 23:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization of performers by performance. We Got Married is nothing but a variety show, and the participants are hardly "contestants". There is a long-standing precedence against these types of categories: User:Good Olfactory/CFD#Reality TV participants. It is non-defining categorization. ℯxplicit 01:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of concert tours of South Korea

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to all parents: Category:South Korean music-related lists, Category:Concert tours of South Korea, Category:Lists of concert tours and Category:Lists of events in South Korea. – Fayenatic London 23:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Lists of concert tours of South Korea to Category:Lists of concert tours by South Korean musicians
Nominator's rationale: These are not lists of concert tours of South Korea, they are lists of concert tours by South Korean musicians that take place in South Korea, among other countries. Alternatively, this can be upmerged to its parent categories as too small. ℯxplicit 01:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As it is currently named, this is a horrible idea: imagine how many concert tours have gone thru America! Tours by artist nationality is probably trivial and wouldn't be used for navigation. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge or rename per nom. Deletion of the South Korean subcat on its own is not appropriate, it should only be considered for deletion if the parent Category:Lists of concert tours is discussed in conjunction. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_12&oldid=1138411025"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 12, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.