Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 June 24
June 24
Category:Recipients of the U-boat Front Clasp
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯxplicit 00:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Non-defining category for an obscure decoration. Fails WP:CATDEF & WP:OCAWARD. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Medieval law
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. ℯxplicit 00:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:614 in law to Category:614 and Category:7th century in law
- Propose merging Category:643 in law to Category:643 and Category:7th century in law
- Propose merging Category:668 in law to Category:668 and Category:7th century in law
more categories |
|---|
|
- Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, nearly all categories contain only one article and it's quite unlikely these categories will be populated any better. Some notes:
- A number of categories don't need a double upmerge to a Law-by-century category because their article is already in a Treaties-by-century subcat (see bottom half of the category list).
- This nomination ends in 1200, thereafter it makes more sense to categorize by decade instead of century, just like already happens in the Treaties subcat tree.
- This is a continuation of this earlier nomination.
- - Marcocapelle (talk) 12:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- I do not think treaties ought generally to be in a law tree. I doubtwe will ever find enough law to merit anything less than century categories. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.