Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 March 14

March 14

Category:Polish–Teutonic War (1519–21)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. – Fayenatic London 11:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Polish–Teutonic War (1519–21) to parent categories

Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, the category only consists of the eponymous article and a subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- The one article will make a good main article for the subcat. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2 articles added. Tim! (talk) 10:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
keep sufficient material for a category for a small but interesting war Hmains (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
keep Reasonably-sized category and subcategory. There probably is scope for expansion. Dimadick (talk) 09:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ultra Naté

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Ultra Naté (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Music artist without enough related articles to justify an eponymous category beyond her albums and songs, which are already categorized in albums and songs by artist categories as recommended per WP:OCEPON. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Library Bards

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Library Bards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary level of categorization per WP:OCEPON. The one related article is an album already in Category:Library Bards albums. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As always per OCEPON, every musical artist who exists does not automatically get one of these just to contain the standard set of music-related content — they're permitted only for musical acts whose notability is exceptional enough that there's a lot of related spinoff content to file in it. That is, you gotta be the Beatles or the Stones or Fleetwood Mac or Leonard Cohen or Beyoncé to get one of these, not just a working band that exists. Bearcat (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Streets in Cave City, Kentucky

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 06:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Streets in Cave City, Kentucky (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Pointless category: Only 1 entry which is just a redirect. Tinton5 (talk) 03:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Useless. Note that Category:Streets in Louisville, Kentucky (biggest city in the state) doesn't exist yet, so this is rather silly. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 18:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is a subcategory of Category:Streets in Kentucky, which consists of several subcategories with no more than 5 articles each. Maybe we should upmerge them all to Category:Streets in Kentucky rather than straight-up deleting?--Martin IIIa (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- we do not need a category just to hold a redirect. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Every city that exists does not automatically get one of these just to hold redirects from its local street names for the state or federal highways that happen to pass through it. If there were streets in Cave City that were actually reliably sourceable as passing our actual notability standards for roads, and thus had actual articles, then this would be fine — but it's not necessary to hold just one redirect. Bearcat (talk) 14:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.