Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 August 13

August 13

Category:Torchmark Corporation Subsidiaries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 10:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Torchmark Corporation Subsidiaries to Category:Globe Life Subsidiaries

Nominator's rationale: Torchmark Corporation has officially changed its name to Globe Life: https://www.thinkadvisor.com/2019/07/26/torchmark-to-change-its-name-to-globe-life/. Laurettashokler (talk) 21:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support rename though Category:Globe Life may also suffice. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that yesterday User:SportsFan007 created Category:Globe Life redirecting to Category:Torchmark Corporation Subsidiaries. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pyridoisoquinolines

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 August 21#Category:Pyridoisoquinolines

Category:Narula Institute of Technology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Narula Institute of Technology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Only the main article for this tech school and its accompanying logo is not enough to warrant this category as a parent. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:C2F. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- too little content for a category. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ryan Driller

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:14, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Ryan Driller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT. Otherwise, only related article is the list of awards one. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gokul Suresh

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:14, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Gokul Suresh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:OCEPON. Unnecessary eponymous category for what amounts to the one eponymous article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Impact Wrestling webcasts

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:14, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Impact Wrestling webcasts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Category which includes only 1 page. Unlikely enough other pages will be created to warrant category. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 14:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (and pining the category's creator, User:TheUnbeholden). Based on a cursory search, I did not find other articles that could be added to this category. Even the one article in the category does not truly belong, as the topic is a television program not a webcast. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 17:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Black Falcon: My guess would be it was included because in 2005 there was a 6 month period where they couldn't get a TV deal and therefore was only available online. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 17:44, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I saw that earlier, and you're probably right; it's just that the 6-month interval hardly seems defining for the topic overall... Thanks, -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 17:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Nicholas Trestrail

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 10:15, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Nicholas Trestrail (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category with only one article. Overcategorization per WP:OCEPON. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There is insufficient content related to this topic to support an eponymous category. Incidentally, this is also a perfect example of why eponymous categories should not be placed in set categories. As it stands, the East Pool mine is being categorized as a 19th-century Cornish steam engine and mining engineer... -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 17:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wikipedians contributing under Dual License with CC BY-SA

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 August 21#Wikipedians contributing under Dual License with CC BY-SA

Category:Wikipedians contributing under Creative Commons

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 August 21#Category:Wikipedians contributing under Creative Commons