Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 January 11

January 11

Category:Games created using AGS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: "X games" is the accepted standard for all other categories in Category:Video games by game engine as far as I can tell. SoWhy 18:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Least concern biota of California

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Created by banned User:Look2See1. Category:Species by IUCN Red List category subcats are already populated and updated automatically based on taxobox status and status_system. Category appears to be populated by species that are rated least concern globally on the IUCN and also occur in California.
An organism that is considered least concern globally by the IUCN may or may not be considered least concern within California specifically. For species that also occur outside California (non-endemics), to make the judgment that the IUCN status also applies to California specifically would likely be WP:OR.
Category could be split into something like Category:IUCN Red List least concern species that occur in California and Category:NatureServe apparently secure species that occur in California, but in my view that would be overcategorization. Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 14:04, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I agree with deleting that as well. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 15:38, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christianity in New Zealand by city

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. ~ Rob13Talk 03:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge, this is a container category for just two subcategories, it is easier to access them directly from Category:Christianity in New Zealand. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christianity in Bangkok

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ~ Rob13Talk 03:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge per WP:SMALLCAT, apart from the subcategory there is only one article in it. The subcategory does not have to be merged, it is already in Category:Churches in Thailand and Category:Places of worship in Bangkok. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Husbands of British princesses

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Timrollpickering (Talk) 23:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category was created in conjunction with Template:Husbands of British princesses. That template was deleted following discussion here. The conclusion of that discussion was being a husband of a British princess was an appropriate classification, as such individuals don't acquire titles or precedence as a result. This category seems to suffer from the same issue as the template. 2601:241:300:C930:1D8E:D402:BEEA:D579 (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per this discussion. Husbands of British princesses do not hold any titles, rank, or status through marriage. Grouping Gustaf VI Adolf of Sweden, Ferdinand I of Romania, Christian VI of Denmark, Haakon VII of Norway, and other rulers on the basis of marriage to a British princess is senseless and anglocentric. Surtsicna (talk) 02:40, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_11&oldid=886075625"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 January 11, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.