Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 17

April 17

Category:CBC television stations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 16:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Consistency with main article's name Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:47, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dramatic and literary genres by composer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 16:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation, as it only contains one sub-cat. That sub-cat is Stage works by Franz Schubert, which is not a very good match to the parent, so if not deleted this should probably be renamed somehow, e.g. Category:Stage works by composer. – Fayenatic London 21:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Stage works by Franz Schubert

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. bibliomaniac15 05:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is not part of a useful hierarchy of stage works by composer. The contents are adequately categorised in hierarchies for their specific genres e.g. ballets. – Fayenatic London 21:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:DYK user templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: reverse merge keeping the history of the older page. Disclosure: I am WP:INVOLVED, but we all agree, and there is no point leaving this open; I assume other closers are avoiding it because it appears confusing. – Fayenatic London 08:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:DYK user templates to Category:DYK userboxes
Nominator's rationale: Category:DYK user templates is a duplicate category created in 2018, so merge it into older category. Then rename Category:DYK userboxes to Category:DYK user templates for consistency with subcategories of Category:Userboxes. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The advantage of keeping the oldest page is keeping most of the editing history. Admittedly in case of category pages this is usually not a very important advantage, but in case of articles it definitely is. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Don't you merge the histories, too? If not, why not? All of the changes should be retained. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • We can merge page histories when they don't overlap by date. Where they do overlap, it would make a confusing mess to merge them. In this situation, where the older page needs to be moved to a new name that already has a page there, we either move the newer page to a third name just to preserve its history (e.g. Category:DYK user templates/Archive, if it is significant), or simply delete it. – Fayenatic London 15:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Citytv Stations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 16:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Second word isn't capitalized Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:58, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Eastern Catholicism in Georgia (country)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 25#Category:Eastern Catholicism in Georgia (country)

Category:Ici Radio-Canada Télé television stations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 16:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Remove redundancy ("Télé television" ?) Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from West Berlin

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 28#Category:People from West Berlin

Category:Sainte-Thérèse, Quebec

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. ƏXPLICIT 01:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename per article name Sainte-Thérèse, this was an opposed WP:C2D nomination at CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
copy of CFDS discussion
User:BrownHairedGirl you made a mistake for opposing, click on Sainte-Thérèse because there is no disambiguate the comma-province title by removing Quebec and it's about the city in Quebec. If it's still speedy oppose take the category to CFD. 2001:569:74D2:A800:A4CA:550C:3110:A638 (talk) 07:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Most of that reply makes little sense. My oppose stands, for the reasons stated. Feel free to open a full CFD if you want to. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BrownHairedGirl: Sainte-Thérèse is indeed an article and not a dab page, so this is a straightforward C2D. I wonder why this "makes little sense". Brandmeistertalk 15:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Brandmeister, the IP's reply is goobbledygook, which is why I wrote that it "makes little sense".
Sorry, I over-simplified: Sainte-Thérèse is indeed an article, but it is ambiguous, with a hatnote to the dab page at Saint Teresa. So it fails the WP:C2D requirement of you ambiguity. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BrownHairedGirl: At Saint Teresa only Sainte-Thérèse uses that exact French spelling, so this is unambiguous, at least in terms of what we have. Brandmeistertalk 16:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Brandmeister, ambiguity is not limited to use of the exact same spelling. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But what about all the other places named that, at the disambiguation page, including:
Sainte-Thérèse-de-Blainville, Quebec, Canada
Sainte-Thérèse-de-la-Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Sainte-Thérèse-de-Gaspé, Quebec, Canada
Saint-Eustache—Sainte-Thérèse (electoral district) a federal riding in Quebec, Canada
Lac-Sainte-Thérèse, Ontario, Canada; a rural community
Lac Ste.-Thérèse (Lake Ste. Therese), Ontario, Canada; a lake
Sainte-Thérèse station (Exo), Sainte-Thérèse, Quebec, Canada; a commuter rail station
Sainte-Thérèse Assembly (Saint Therese Plant), a defunct General Motors automotive factory
Fort Sainte Thérèse, several French colonial era forts on the Richelieu River in Canada, New France
Séminaire de Sainte-Thérèse, a former seminary campus (now converted into a CEGEP) in Sainte-Thérèse, Quebec, Canada
Académie Sainte-Thérèse, a French-language private school in des Laurentides, Quebec, Canada
Clinique Sainte-Thérèse Heliport, and Clinique Sainte-Thérèse; Luxembourg City, Luxembourg; see List of airports in Luxembourg
Church of St. Thérèse of Lisieux (disambiguation)
Sainte Therese Church, Curepipe, Mauritius
Sainte-Thérèse-de-l'Enfant-Jésus, Hirson, Aisne, France
? The article currently at the main title should be moved to make way for the disambiguation page to be put there. --Doncram (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strictly, none of those is the same exact name to match WP:D2D where a parenthetical or a comma disambiguation would be required. Responded at RM discussion. Brandmeistertalk 07:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How is anyone (reader or editor) helped by this proposal to consciously creating avoidable ambiguity? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As this is Wikipedia in English, Sainte-Thérèse is not ambiguous. People searching for Saint Teresa will not type Sainte-Thérèse, as in the French Wikipedia. Brandmeistertalk 13:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Heads of Moscow

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. bibliomaniac15 03:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only content is Category:Mayors of Moscow, which is already adequately categorised. Rathfelder (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bosnian painters

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 26#Category:Bosnian painters

Category:Albums produced by Alex Hope

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. bibliomaniac15 17:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per Alex Hope (songwriter) ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films featuring hunters

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 29#Category:Films featuring hunters

Category:Dutch-language LGBT writers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 16:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:OCEGRS, as an unrelated intersection with sexual orientation. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
(maybe there are more, just the two that most readily spring to mind). Maybe we need to revisit this every three years (do we?). @Marcocapelle: could you tell us what in your mind maybe makes this different from the discussions we had three and six years ago? Maybe guidance and/or sensibilities changed in that time, but afaik neither WP:OVERCAT (which contains the WP:OCEGRS guidance), nor the WP:EGRS guideline (which is the basis for the WP:OCEGRS guidance) changed much in that period. Tx for giving a bit more background if you can. --Francis Schonken (talk) 13:56, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per fairly extended rationales given by different people in previous CfDs, that is: provisionally, depending on whether some more context can be given why it would be different this time (see my comment above) No additional data: OP who participated in previous CfDs didn't even bother to look whether anything had changed – this is still categorisers having trouble with reality and reliable sources, nothing else. --Francis Schonken (talk) 13:56, 17 April 2020 (UTC) Updated 20:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I changed my mind in the course of the discussions, starting to oppose in 2014, then just commenting in 2017, now proposing deletion after all. While I still think that language is the most important characteristic of a writer, even before nationality, I have come to realize that writers are in a language category anyway (if they write in another language than default based on nationality), so that this argument is basically irrelevant. In addition I have come to realize that these categories merely contribute to a lot of overlap, e.g. nearly all German LGBT writers are in both Category:LGBT writers from Germany and in Category:German-language LGBT writers which just causes unnecessary category clutter in the articles. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Can't speak for the German ones. For the Dutch-language ones, it's rather the "by country" which makes no sense for the Belgians, and if either Category:Dutch-language LGBT writers & Category:French-language LGBT writers should go or Category:LGBT writers from Belgium, it's obviously the latter while that one is much more in tension with WP:OCEGRS than either of the language subdivisions for the LGBT writers. Gert Hekma's Homoseksualiteit in Nederland van 1730 tot de moderne tijd (2004) is quite clear on the topic: the book is a history of what happened in a single country LGBT-wise except for literature, while Dutch LGBT literature doesn't follow country borders, and what happened in the Netherlands in Dutch-language LGBT literature can't be separated from what happened abroad in the same language on the same topic.
    Like before, I got the impression that reality, as it is, is a problem for Wikipedia's categorisers. Maybe British LGBT writers are intrinsically different from US ones (etc), but for LGBT writers from Flanders the difference with the Walloon ones (French-language part of Belgium) is much more pronounced than with LGBT writers from the Netherlands. Culturally, Dutch-language LGBT writers belong more together than Flemish LGBT writers belong together with the French-speaking compatriots. That's reality (while that's how historians like Hekma, and of course also many others, describe it), and that's what WP:OCEGRS asks us to do, despite what a more "streamlined" (but reality-free) categorisation system would do. --Francis Schonken (talk) 15:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, Dutch-language ones belong in the same category, as obviously also the French-language ones belong in their category, as was extensively, and with referral to several sources, illustrated in the previous CfDs linked above. --Francis Schonken (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Locomotive boilers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: reverse merge. bibliomaniac15 02:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplication – no locomotives use boilers apart from steam locomotives, so I can't see any reason for us to need two categories for them. WT79 The Engineer (talk) 12:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support there is only a need for one category here per the nominator. I don't have a preference regarding the direction of the merge. Thryduulf (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • no locomotives use boilers apart from steam locomotives - not strictly true. In Britain, in the early years of Diesel traction, a large number of passenger coaches were in service that had steam heating equipment but not electric heaters. Many of these coaches were not expected to remain in service more than ten years, and instead of converting these coaches for electric heat, a significant proportion of Diesel locos built down to 1968 were given means for producing steam for the train heating pipe, known as a steam generator - a boiler to all intents and purposes. There were several types, from three manufacturers - Clayton, Spanner and Stone-Vapor. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reverse merge -- You only have a boiler if you want steam, so that including "steam" in the category name is redundant. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or reverse merge per WP:OVERLAPCAT. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:56, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ambrosiana

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 27#Category:Ambrosiana

Category:Ships of Washington (state)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 27#Category:Ships of Washington (state)

Category:People educated at The Priory School, Shrewsbury

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: split to Category:People educated at The Priory Boys' Grammar School, Shrewsbury, and likewise for the girls school as and when member articles are created. – Fayenatic London 10:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The Priory School, Shrewsbury (current) is not the same school as the Priory Grammar School, Shrewsbury (which existed from 1910 to 1981). The ambiguity in naming has led to Peter Reynolds (archaeologist) being been put in the category 'People educated at the Priory School, Shrewsbury'. RoachPeter (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- For clarity, it needs to be said that there was a boys grammar school and a girls grammar school, both using the name Priory, the latter being the predecessor of the present Priory School. Do we need "the" in either case? (not sure). What we do need is a main article on the boys grammar school. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - there are some details at [1]. "The Priory School is the founding member of The Priory School Trust. Set up as a girls’ grammar school in 1939, it became a mixed comprehensive when Priory Boys’ Grammar School (now Shrewsbury Sixth Form College) joined in 1980." Personally I would set up Category:People educated at The Priory School, Shrewsbury with 2 subcats Category:People educated at Priory Boys' Grammar School, Shrewsbury (which has members) and Category:People educated at Priory Girls' Grammar School, Shrewsbury (if there are any members). Oculi (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subcategorise per Oculi. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Category page was not tagged until today.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Fayenatic London 09:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Split into Category:People educated at the Priory School, Shrewsbury, Category:People educated at The Priory Boys' Grammar School, Shrewsbury, and Category:People educated at The Priory Girls' Grammar School, Shrewsbury. Both grammar schools were succeeded by the Priory (mixed) School, with the boys' grammar school's building later becoming the Shrewsbury Sixth Form Collage – but this should be shown in the relevant articles, not the categories. WT79 The Engineer (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Oculi's and WT79's proposal is in fact contrary to the normal alumni category practice, whereby alumni of a college/school which as been renamed or merged are deemed to have attended the successor. The most bizarre case of this I came across was someone who became an alumni of an Oxford College long before it was founded, because he was a student in a hall then dependent on another College. If this proposal is adopted a long head note will be needed setting out the history and explaining that pre-1980 alumni attended the Priory Girls or Priory Boys School according to gender. I am saying this not because I am fundamentally opposed to their suggestion, to to ensure precedent is applied, even when the results are a little odd. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Asia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in Asia. MER-C 16:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Asia to Category:2019-2020 coronavirus pandemic in Asia
Nominator's rationale: This includes China, which started in 2019 Starzoner (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:COVID-19 stubs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Template:COVID19-pandemic-stub and Category:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic stubs. – Fayenatic London 08:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:COVID-19 stubs to Category:Coronavirus disease 2019 stubs
Nominator's rationale: Procedural nomination, declined on Speedy page. – Fayenatic London 08:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Opposed nomination on Speedy page
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People by borough in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 16:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: disperse, this category combines different types of entities based on WP:SHAREDNAME. For example the Alaskan category should be moved to Category:People by county in the United States. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rathfelder (talk) 11:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American war crimes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 16:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match article, United States war crimes. buidhe 05:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Money Heist songs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 16:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:CATDEFINING. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have you actually looked at what's in such categories? And anyway, WP:OSE. DexDor (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Money Heist locations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 16:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:CATDEFINING. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Failed museum proposals in the United States

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 27#Category:Failed museum proposals in the United States

Category:Lists of podcast episodes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 23:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I think this category can be expanded to include other podcasting-related lists such as List of daily news podcasts. This follows the same convention as Category:Journalism lists. – Anne drew 01:00, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deportivo Tepic F.C. players

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 30#Category:Deportivo Tepic F.C. players

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_17&oldid=957281099"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 17, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.