Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 March 12

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 10:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Tom Vilsack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: Small category for a minor politician that is unlikely to grow. Only 1 article is about the topic himself. TM 18:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for Now Really only 2 articles that are defined by him so it's not aiding navigation. No objection to recreating if it ever gets up to 5 or so articles defined by Mr. Vilsack. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 10:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Lesbian criminals (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCEGRS. Please note that Category:LGBT criminals and its subcategories were deleted at CfD in 2006. gnu57 15:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. Fails WP:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality#Special_subcategories. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per BHG. Rathfelder (talk) 18:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom & BHG & precedent. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per BHG. OcelotCreeper (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. – Fayenatic London 16:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Medical outbreaks in the Honduras (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: Should just be "in Honduras" JTtheOG (talk) 03:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy rename to Category:Medical outbreaks in Honduras per WP:C2C; the convention of Category:Honduras is no definite article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Category:Health in Honduras and Category:Natural disasters in Honduras, and similarly for its siblings. After the rename of the "outbreak" articles to "pandemic", the outbreak category tree has become redundant. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:57, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• (changing my !vote) Merge to Category:Health in Honduras and Category:Natural disasters in Honduras per. Marcocapelle That's a better solution. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Snow-way this is going to be deleted. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Bananas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: Your reason(s) for the proposed deletion. 2A00:23C5:1C00:C001:A53E:AEE8:F5E4:A505 (talk) 02:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in the universe is either a banana or not a banana. Even things that aren't bananas still have something to do with bananas in the sense that they're not bananas. We don't need a category that lists every single article on the entireity of Wikipedia, that's just plain ridiculous!

• Um, okaaaay... that's a Keep from me. I like bananas because they have no bones. Grutness...wha? 02:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, please read the rules for fools. Here's a related video, but I have my suspicions this is a naughty IP user! :o dibbydib ^💬/_✏ 04:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Not seeing any valid deletion rationale here. PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - it is greatly distressing to see bananas being singled out for special treatment while equally culpable fruits escape scot-free. Oculi (talk) 08:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep nonsense proposal. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep I like various types of banana and I treat all of them equally. Chongkian (talk) 13:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.