Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 16

October 16

Category:LigaPro

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:LigaPro to Category:Liga Portugal 2

Nominator's rationale: To reflect the new competition naming (source). Ideally, all subcategories should also be changed accordingly. Parutakupiu (talk) 22:23, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 09:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support to match official name. Giant Snowman 09:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Tomiko Van

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 17:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Tomiko Van (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Minimal content for an eponymous category per WP:OCEPON. The two subcats sufficiently link to and from one another. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2107

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: do as nominated. Those listed as "renaming" were actually "merges". Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:2107 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2107 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2107 to Category:Fiction set in the 2100s
Propose deleting Category:2108 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2108 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2108 to Category:Fiction set in the 2100s
Propose deleting Category:2142 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2142 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2142 to Category:Fiction set in the 2140s
Propose deleting Category:2144 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2144 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2144 to Category:Fiction set in the 2140s
Propose deleting Category:2148 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2148 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2148 to Category:Fiction set in the 2140s
Propose deleting Category:2154 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2154 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2154 to Category:Fiction set in the 2150s
Propose deleting Category:2157 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2157 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2157 to Category:Fiction set in the 2150s
Propose deleting Category:2169 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2169 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2169 to Category:Fiction set in the 2160s
Propose deleting Category:2173 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2173 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2173 to Category:Fiction set in the 2170s
Propose deleting Category:2176 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2176 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2176 to Category:Fiction set in the 2170s
Propose deleting Category:2179 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2179 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2179 to Category:Fiction set in the 2170s
Propose deleting Category:2181 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Fiction set in 2181 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose renaming Category:Films set in 2181 to Category:Fiction set in the 2180s

Nominator's rationale: Single-page category trees (respectively, Total Reality and Astro Boy (film)). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with nominator that these categories do not aid navigation. Merge Category:Films set in 2107 to Category:Films set in the 2100s, merge Category:Films set in 2108 to Category:Films set in the 2100s, otherwise as nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Added 10 similar year categories and their subcats. All contain fiction-by-setting categories exclusively. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then merge all films in year categories to films in decade categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Marcocapelle, year categories should be merged to decade categories, unless they are further populated. Dimadick (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all to Category:Fiction set in the 22nd century. In all cases, this will be intended to be a time in the distant (remote) future, so that the exact year (or even decade) is insignificant, usually being a random choice of the author. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:37, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this !vote was misplaced and is referring to the section ~~immediately above~~. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 09:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment2 I've moved it now. It was misplaced in the CfD immediately below. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2115

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 November 19#Category:2115

Category:Dreadnought hoax

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. MER-C 18:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Dreadnought hoax (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Now at 12 members. Johnbod (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is no longer a small category. Dimadick (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NONDEF e.g. for Virginia Woolf. Only one article is specifically about the hoax and all the articles are in much more appropriate categories (e.g. the ship is categorized as a ship). Linking between related articles is in article text; categories are for grouping articles about similar topics. DexDor^(talk) 09:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is less defining for VW than I suppose all the others, but picking the weakest link is not a good argument for deletion. It is certainly defining for most of them. That all members are in appropriate but unrelated other categories is no argument for deletion at all! If that's the best you've got, the case for "keep" looks stronger. Johnbod (talk) 11:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's non-defining for most/all of the articles (apart from the eponymous one) - e.g. many/most don't mention the hoax in the lede at all. That's the reason for deletion. DexDor^(talk) 13:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, not a small category, and entries seem appropriate to the topic. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional hoaxers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 17:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Fictional hoaxers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT. Also, I doubt this is defining for the one character in this category. ★Trekker (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How would this be defining for a character? Would an entire bio section be dominated by a single event? Dimadick (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works set in the 28th century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: There is unanimity that only one of the categories should exist, so defaulting to the one with most support, which results in merge as nominated. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Works set in the 28th century to Category:Fiction set in the 28th century

Nominator's rationale: We have no articles about non-fictional works about the 28th century. Unlike the, this one is not a WP:SMALLCAT. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:31, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that all content in Category:Fiction set in the 28th century are works, so a reverse merge may be more appropriate. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom No other articles currently except works of fiction. Dimadick (talk) 15:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works set in the 29th century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: There is unanimity that only one of the categories should exist, so defaulting to the one with most support, which results in merge as nominated. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Works set in the 29th century to Category:Fiction set in the 29th century

Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category with a single article. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:29, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that all content in Category:Fiction set in the 29th century are works, so a reverse merge may be more appropriate. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom No other articles currently except works of fiction. Dimadick (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Works set in the 31st century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: There is unanimity that only one of the categories should exist, so defaulting to the one with most support, which results in delete (contents were merged to Category:Fiction set in the 31st century). Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Works set in the 31st century (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Redundant layer of Category:Fiction set in the 31st century, containing only one of its 5 subcategories. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that all content in Category:Fiction set in the 31st century are works, so a reverse merge may be more appropriate. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom No other articles currently except works of fiction. Dimadick (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Category has been emptied. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fiction set in the 7th millennium

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 17:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Fiction set in the 7th millennium to Category:Works set in the future
Propose merging Category:Fiction set in the 9th millennium to Category:Works set in the future
Propose merging Category:Fiction set in the 10th millennium to Category:Works set in the future

Nominator's rationale: Possible WP:SMALLCATs. 7th millennium has 2 pages, both of which are Doctor Who episodes; 9th millennium has one book and Category:Mega Man Legends; and 10th millennium has one television series and the television episode "The Late Philip J. Fry". –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:5th millennium

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 17:54, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:5th millennium (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:6th millennium (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:7th millennium (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:9th millennium (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. Various articles about the future, such as 5th millennium, have been merged into broader-scope articles, in this case List of future astronomical events, due to lack of content aside from things like the Time Pyramid and astronomical events. These categories contain no contents except for a fiction-related subcategory. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - originally took me a second to realise these were millennia and not centuries, but the subcategories could be moved easily elsewhere. SportingFlyer T·C 16:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, redundant category layer for future periods that are too far ahead for non-fictional content. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:All Ice Records artists

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 November 13#Category:All Ice Records artists

Category:Bing (search engine)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 November 13#Category:Bing (search engine)

Category:Formula One non-Championship races

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Formula One non-Championship races to Category:Formula One non-championship races

Nominator's rationale: proper capitalization cherkash (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy rename per WP:C2A. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:17, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.