Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 September 1

September 1

Category:List of land ungulates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 18:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:List of land ungulates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Duplicate of Category:Ungulates. Not a list. DrKay (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary duplicate that was immediately spammed broadly by creator, AND misnamed. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Elmidae. It seems like the creator does not have a good understanding of the purpose and hierarchical structure of categories. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 09:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bearlings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: procedural close. Category:Bearlings has already been deleted for being empty. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Bearlings to Category:Individual bears

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge small category. DrKay (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Etiology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Cause (medicine) to conform with the main article as it stands right now. bibliomaniac 1 5 18:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming

Category:Etiology to Category:Etiology (medicine)
or
Category:Etiology to Category:Cause (medicine)

Nominator's rationale: to disambiguate from the broader concept of etiology, aka causality. This category is clearly for medical etiology, and its title should reflect that.
The category text says that the head article is Etiology (medicine), but that page was moved[1] in 2017 to Cause (medicine), without discussion.
As far as I can see from the interwikilinks, most other languages use some variant of "etiology", which is why I list that as the first choice ... but I'd be happy with either form. Just disambiguate it somehow. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to avoid ambiguity, preferably to Category:Cause (medicine) per WP:C2D. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac 1 5 05:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In medical literature etiology is used more than cause. Rathfelder (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then an RM regarding the article title may be appropriate. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cultural depictions of The Red Baron

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Cultural depictions of The Red Baron to Category:Cultural depictions of Manfred von Richthofen

Nominator's rationale: The parent category is Category:Manfred von Richthofen and the main article is Manfred von Richthofen. I can understand the rationale for the current name as he usually is called "the Red Baron" in cultural depictions. (Also, "Manfred von Richthofen" can refer to other people.) I'm happy either way, I just want it to be discussed. Also, if the name is kept, do we need to capitalize "The"? Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If kept, decapitalize "The". Marcocapelle (talk) 12:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom To match the main article. Dimadick (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People by city or town

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. MER-C 18:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:People by city in Belgium to ~~Category:People by city or town in Belgium~~ Category:People by populated place in Belgium
Propose renaming Category:People by city in Israel to ~~Category:People by city or town in Israel~~ Category:People by populated place in Israel
Propose renaming Category:People by city in the Netherlands to ~~Category:People by city or town in the Netherlands~~ Category:People by populated place in the Netherlands

Nominator's rationale: This name change is needed to cover the contents of the category. ~~Many other countries already follow this model.~~ gidonb (talk) 01:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, the Dutch tree contains people by municipality. While in the Netherlands municipalities mostly coincide with cities, they are generally much bigger entities than towns. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marcocapelle, at present, this is not necessarily by municipality. Check out for example the categories for Bergambacht and Den Ham. There are many of these! Maybe you referred to an ideal case or the fact that municipalities are included? Belgium has categories by municipality next to by city (or town)! gidonb (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just with the letter A. The following are municipalities not named after a town or village: Aa en Hunze, Achtkarspelen, Albrandswaard, Alphen-Chaam, Altena, North Brabant and Ameland. The following are towns or villages not eponymous to a municipality, but they are eponymous to a former municipality: Abcoude, Akersloot, Amerongen, Andijk and Anna Paulowna. Then finally we also have three former municipalities which were not directly named after a town or village: Aalburg, Arcen en Velden and Avereest. So technically this tree should be called Category:People by municipality or former municipality in the Netherlands. Or otherwise it needs to have a major overhaul. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant. People by former municipality is nondefining. gidonb (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rename all to the form Category:People by populated place in Belgium. This format was the result of a consensus perhaps a decade ago to avoid the need for noms (and arguments on scope) such as this. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Category:People by populated place in ''Foo'' per Peterkingiron. Grutness...wha? 04:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have no problem with this solution, whatever covers it all. gidonb (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC) Adjusted the proposal accordingly. gidonb (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Category:People by populated place in ''Foo'' per Peterkingiron. That is sufficiently broad. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.