Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 September 23
September 23
Category:Jump5
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary parent for one subcategory of articles. The discography page can be downmerged to the albums subcat. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Connection (band)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Delete Timrollpickering (talk) 10:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: A band with an article on one album does not require an eponymous category. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Scientific institutions
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 11#Category:Scientific institutions
Category:Channel 4 television programmes
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep. MER-C 18:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: A soft redirect to Category:Channel 4 television shows, which was deleted by JJMC89 bot III. When you select the soft redirect in WP:HotCat it adds the redlink, as in this edit. The soft redirect's Category_talk: page should also be deleted; it is now a hard-redirect to Category talk:Channel 4 original programming, AnomieBOT III updated the redirect target "following a move-without-redirect of Category talk:Channel 4 television shows". @JJMC89: @Anomie: maybe one or both bots ought to behave differently in such cases. jnestorius(talk) 18:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose -- calling everything a show is an Americanism. This is a British channel, which is why is "programmes". Peterkingiron (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Peterkingiron: perhaps some misunderstanding of the proposal. The "shows" name you dislike has already been deleted and is not proposed to be resurrected. The live category name is "original programming" per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 August 15#Television series and network original programming. The "programmes" category under discussion is a soft redirect to "shows", which is deleted. So either "programmes" should repoint to "original programming" or should be deleted completely. I favour deletion, per MOS:TVCATS: "TV series should avoid network categories when they were not originally produced for that network". jnestorius(talk) 09:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Note that JJMC89 ended up fixing the catredirect target, which is what should have been done in the first place. Don't see the need to open a entire CFD about this. bibliomaniac15 19:36, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Piso Frugi
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename Timrollpickering (talk) 10:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Piso Frugi to Category:Calpurnii Pisones Frugi
- Nominator's rationale: Correct naming scheme. ★Trekker (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Plural should be used for this family's members. Dimadick (talk) 17:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sherlock Holmes in television
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 11#Category:Sherlock Holmes in television
Category:Preschool education television series
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Keep Timrollpickering (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Undefined purpose and very few page members. There already exists the separate categories for preschool series by country/nationality, so this seems very pointless and clutter-y to me. Meetertound (talk) 20:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose, it currently contains 7 valid subcategories and 40 articles, that is not very few. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Marcocapelle. 40 is not "very few". Grutness...wha? 03:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - per above. With 40 articles and 7 subcategories WP:SMALLCAT most definitely does not apply. Inter&anthro (talk) 03:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.