Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 10

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:People from Queens, New York, by occupation. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:People from Queens, New York by occupation to Category:People from Queens, New York, by occupation

Nominator's rationale: See WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 November 25#People by city and occupation. --Thedarkknightli (talk) 23:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. --Just N. (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge and delete. – Fayenatic London 20:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Template:Catalonia-painter-stub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: One usage; most other professions are upmerged to Category:Catalan people stubs. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Surely the logical upmerge is Template:Spain-painter-stub? In notability terms, occupation is likely to trump ethnicity in most cases. —Brigade Piron (talk) 10:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Interestingly, {{Catalonia-business-bio-stub}} is upmerged to Category:European business biography stubs and Category:Catalan people stubs. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. An upmerge to Category:Catalan people stubs would be okay as well. --Just N. (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I support a dual upmerge. ~~~~
  User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge and delete. – Fayenatic London 20:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Template:Greenland-law-bio-stub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: One usage; two other professions are already upmerged to Category:Greenlandic people stubs. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Upmerge falls below 60; target to Category:North American law biography stubs and Category:Greenlandic people stubs. It is worth noting that this category and the Greenland gov set right below were made by a now-blocked problematic editor. Curbon7 (talk) 07:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nom. An upmerge is fine. --Just N. (talk) 19:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 02:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Inspector Gadget films to Category:Inspector Gadget

Nominator's rationale: Smallcat ★Trekker (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. --Just N. (talk) 19:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 02:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Al-Sadd FC (Saudi Arabia) players (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Only one entry. Delete per WP:SMALLCAT. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as duplicate of Category:Al-Sadd FC (Saudi football club) players. GiantSnowman 22:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Category has been emptied. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as duplicate! --Just N. (talk) 19:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 03:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Songs about mental disorders to Category:Songs about mental health
• Propose renaming Category:Short stories about mental disorders to Category:Short stories about mental health

Nominator's rationale: This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 30#Mental illness in fiction, where "mental illness" categories were renamed to "mental disorders". These two categories do not contain articles or sub-cats about specific disorders, so should be part of Category:Mental health in fiction rather than of Category:Mental disorders in fiction. – Fayenatic London 17:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per actual content. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. --Xurizuri (talk) 23:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Alt rename' to Category:Songs about lost mental health & Category:Short stories about lost mental health. More precise! Otherwise it could be confused with products about wellness plans and health virtue recommendations (business!) --Just N. (talk) 19:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I do not think that is a good idea. The tree of mental health is largely about "lost mental health" anyway, and I have never seen "lost mental health" as a viable encyclopedic topic. Lost mental health isn't even a redirect. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I can't say I've ever heard the phrase "lost mental health". --Xurizuri (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Dutch shipbuilders to Category:Dutch boat builders including all the other Ship builder/Boat builder categories.

Nominator's rationale: For example some yacht builders are listed in the category boat builder and the others are listed in ship builder. It's a vague term and mistakes by other editors will be made. One category should be held for boat builders. Coldbolt (talk) 10:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and move companies into Category:Dutch boat builders. Category:Dutch shipbuilders is a people category, subcat of Category:Dutch people; Category:Dutch boat builders in contrast is a subcat of Category:Shipbuilding companies of the Netherlands. (Category:Dutch boat builders should be renamed to Category:Boat builders of the Netherlands or similar, together with its siblings.) Oculi (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, I purged the two articles about companies. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong oppose -- This nom is misconceived, The articles I sampled were all on shipbuilders from some centuries ago, who were building ships, not boats. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Oculi's proposals and Peterkingiron. --Just N. (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated. – Fayenatic London 23:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Christian denominations in European navigational boxes to Category:Christian denominations in Europe navigational boxes

Nominator's rationale: Wrong spelling. Barumbarumba (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Alt rename to Category:Christianity in Europe navigational boxes, the navboxes in the category are not specifically about denominations. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename per nom. - And no, I'm strongly against that alt rename proposal by Marco. --Just N. (talk) 19:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Why so? All templates in the category are in the format of Template:Christianity in Bulgaria. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Barumbarumba: it might be helpful if you comment on the alt rename proposal too. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• @Marcocapelle: Well they are all just denominations that are active in that country and are organized based on their traditions. More like "Types of Christianity in [country name]". When you talk about Christianity as a whole in a country you also must have its history for example or defunct denominations which these templates do not and are not meant to. It's more like "what tradition is present at the moment in that country and what organizations represents them?". I think it might actually be better to rename the templates themselves to "Christian denominations in [country name]" to get rid of the confusion altogether. Barumbarumba (talk) 14:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Virginia state constitutional officer elections to Category:Virginia commonwealth constitutional officer elections

Nominator's rationale: Virginia is a commonwealth. SecretName101 (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose, Virginia is a state, even if commonwealth is part of its official name (see WP:COMMONNAME). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Kentucky state constitutional officer elections to Category:Kentucky commonwealth constitutional officer elections

Nominator's rationale: Kentucky is a commonwealth SecretName101 (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This category has been emptied. No need for renaming. Could have been tagged for CSD C1. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, Kentucky is a state, even if commonwealth is part of its official name (see WP:COMMONNAME). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Massachusetts state constitutional officer elections to Category:Massachusetts commonwealth constitutional officer elections

Nominator's rationale: Massachusetts is a commonwealth, not a state SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment First, SecretName101, you created these categories. When you realized your mistake, you could have tagged the pages for speedy deletion as the page creator. Second, these seem like speedy renames, not cases where a week-long discussion is necessary. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, Massachusetts is a state, even if commonwealth is part of its official name (see WP:COMMONNAME). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Pennsylvania state constitutional officer elections to Category:Pennsylvania commonwealth constitutional officer elections

Nominator's rationale: Pennsylvania is a is a commonwealth, not a state . SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose, Pennsylvania is a state, even if commonwealth is part of its official name (see WP:COMMONNAME). Marcocapelle (talk) 07:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted WP:G7; but there would be no objection to re-creating a redirect at these names. – Fayenatic London 18:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:State constitutional officers of Kentucky to Category:Commonwealth constitutional officers of Kentucky

Nominator's rationale: Redundent. SecretName101 (talk) 03:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment {{db-self}} -- nominator SecretName101 (talk · contribs) created the category, and it is empty -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted WP:G7; but there would be no objection to re-creating a redirect at these names. – Fayenatic London 18:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Mississippi state consititutional officers to Category:State constitutional officers of Mississippi

Nominator's rationale: Your reason(s) for the proposed merger. SecretName101 (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This category has been emptied. There is nothing to merge. Could have been tagged CSD C1. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment {{db-self}} -- nominator SecretName101 (talk · contribs) created the category, and it is empty -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Jaypee University of Information Technology to Category:Universities in Himachal Pradesh

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, this category only contains one member and is unlikely to grow. ✗plicit 01:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- without prejudice to recreation if we get more articles that need this category. At present we only have the main article, which is not enough for a category. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• ' Merge per nom. --Just N. (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.