Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 4

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: soft merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging: Category:Bolivian radio hosts with Category:Bolivian radio presenters and Category:Bolivian television hosts with Category:Bolivian television presenters

Nominator's rationale: Both categories are in effect the same. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 04:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 10:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Blind earthquakes to Category:Buried rupture earthquakes

Nominator's rationale: Based on main article, Buried rupture earthquake. Animal lover 666 (talk) 20:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Malayalam-language Hotstar original films to Category:Hotstar original films

Nominator's rationale: Not enough content. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge -- but there should also be a Category:Malayalam-language films category, as that language will be incomprehensible to Hindi or Urdu speakers. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: soft merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:People from Minoa, New York to Category:People from Onondaga County, New York

Nominator's rationale: Small one-county community with just 1 entry. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. – Fayenatic London 09:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Australian Broadcasting Corporation specials to Category:ABC TV (Australian TV channel) specials

Nominator's rationale: Consistency with main article's name Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose as categories include shows which have aired across the corporation's network, not just on the ABC TV channel. Happily888 (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. – Fayenatic London 09:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Australian Broadcasting Corporation original programming to Category:ABC TV (Australian TV channel) original programming

Nominator's rationale: Consistency with main article's name Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose as categories include shows which have aired across the corporation's network, not just on the ABC TV channel. Happily888 (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: soft merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Forced disappearances in the Gambia to Category:Forced disappearances Category:Enforced disappearances

Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, limited possibility for expansion since the Gambia has seen major political changes meaning that forced disappearances are less likely in the future (t · c) buidhe 01:53, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NB the correct parent category is Category:Enforced disappearances, in-line with parent article Enforced disappearance. Any merge (and I have no real view either way) should be to there. GiantSnowman 10:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, that just got moved via the speedy process. (t · c) buidhe 12:19, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: soft merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Forced disappearances in Syria to Category:Forced disappearances Category:Enforced disappearances

Nominator's rationale: Only one article (t · c) buidhe 01:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NB the correct parent category is Category:Enforced disappearances, in-line with parent article Enforced disappearance. Any merge (and I have no real view either way) should be to there. GiantSnowman 10:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, it was just moved via speedy process. (t · c) buidhe 12:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete along with Category:Science fiction character stubs, merging to Category:Science fiction stubs and Category:Fictional character stubs. – Fayenatic London 09:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Template:Sf-char-stub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: Two uses; looks like this can be merged into Category:Fictional character stubs. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment If upmerged, it should upmerge to both parents, including {{scifi-stub}} -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Rename, along with Category:Psapharochrus stubs to Category:Aegomorphus stubs. – Fayenatic London 07:26, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Template:Psapharochrus-stub to Template:Aegomorphus-stub

Nominator's rationale: These are now synonyms, and the main article is at Aegomorphus. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @1234qwer1234qwer4: no pages use that template at the moment; the species that I checked from Aegomorphus use {{Acanthoderini-stub}}. Will you replace the latter with the renamed stub template? – Fayenatic London 08:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I intend to do that since they are quite numerous. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete including Category:Pakistani agriculture stubs. Replace template with {{agri-stub}} and {{Pakistan-stub}}. – Fayenatic London 22:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Template:Pakistan-agri-stub (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: One usage. Apparently the only by-country agriculture stub type apart from Category:Indian agriculture stubs. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Upmerge 7 uses now; target Category:Agriculture stubs and Category:Pakistan stubs. Curbon7 (talk) 07:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Frank Miller (comics) to Category:Frank Miller
• Propose renaming Category:Characters created by Frank Miller (comics) to Category:Characters created by Frank Miller
• Propose renaming Category:Works by Frank Miller (comics) to Category:Works by Frank Miller
• Propose renaming Category:Comics by Frank Miller (comics) to Category:Comics by Frank Miller
• Propose renaming Category:Films directed by Frank Miller (comics) to Category:Films directed by Frank Miller
• Propose renaming Category:Films with screenplays by Frank Miller (comics) to Category:Films with screenplays by Frank Miller

Nominator's rationale: Subject of this category has moved to Frank Miller. Saturdayopen (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, I have taken the liberty to merge the nominations. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - there are many Frank Millers, and at least 3 of them (Frank Miller (screenwriter), Frank Miller (newspaper cartoonist), Frank Miller (editorial cartoonist)) could have produced works, comics, screenplays and directed films. It was a strange decision to rename the article. (Eg there is Category:Films directed by Frank Miller (screenwriter).) Oculi (talk) 12:28, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retain Category:Frank Miller (comics), which clearly needs a disambiguator and merge to it all the rest, except Category:Characters created by Frank Miller (comics). "works" is a useless level that merely leads to some others and the rest are too small to keep. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Oppose per Oculi and Peterkingiron -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 05:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Non-free files lacking a non-free use rationale for more than 7 days (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Not actually populated by {{Di-no non-free use rationale}}. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It is applied by {{File page NFCC concerns tag}}, however. Anomie⚔ 12:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Which I've nominated for deletion at TfD as unused and redundant. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:24, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Await outcome: Delete if the TfD leads to deletion. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete as empty (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Reuploaded deleted images (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Propose deleting Category:Verified reuploaded deleted images (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Categories previously populated by bot which has not run since 2009. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.