Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 11

November 11

Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in England and Wales

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in England and Wales (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in England (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), and Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in Wales (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs).

Nominator's rationale: Almost every entry is a WP:NPOV violation. For a church to be a *former* Roman Catholic church, it would have to have changed hands. This is only true if you believe that the Church of England did not exist before the Reformation. The view of the Church of England itself, however, is that its history begins in 597 with Augustine of Canterbury, and that none of these buildings have ever changed hands since they were built. Marnanel (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - you need to add Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in England and Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in Wales to the nom. Oculi (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment- done; thank you! Marnanel (talk) 18:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - And Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in the United Kingdom. Oculi (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this largely overlaps with Category:7th-century church buildings in England up to the 15th century. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is about (1) monasteries dissolved at the Reformation (2) any Anglican church built before the Reformation. As others have said this is about any church in England and Wales of the period. The English church was reformed at the Reformation. Some Catholic masses continued illegally in private houses, before a new Catholic church was organised in England considerably later. This certainly fails WP:NPOV. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or in theory it could contain every pre-Reformation Church of England church too. If the categories were intended for something more specific, they'd need re-naming. Sionk (talk) 13:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient Egyptian Royal Seal-bearer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Ancient Egyptian royal sealers. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Ancient Egyptian Royal Seal-bearer to Category:Ancient Egyptian royal seal-bearers

Nominator's rationale: While there's no article on this office yet (which disqualifies it from speedy renaming), it seems that: a) the title should be lowercased; b) be in plural, because the category only contains the office holders. Brandmeister^talk 10:57, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Category:Ancient Egyptian royal sealers, the two categories undoubtedly have the same scope. Ultimately they may be merged to Category:Ancient Egyptian officials, as it does not seem a very substantive title. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as well, barring other considerations. Brandmeister^talk 14:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested. They sound like the same office. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:DC Animated Universe templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: upmerge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkl talk 16:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:DC Animated Universe templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: SMALLCAT ★Trekker (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upmerge to parent categories rather than delete, there is no reason to leave the template orphaned. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Promising Young Woman

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 19#Category:Promising Young Woman