Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 26
October 26
Category:Private schools Northern Beaches Sydney
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Category:Private schools Northern Beaches Sydney
Category:All Elite Wrestling personnel
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep and include all personnel. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: This should not be a category because AEW roster is not permanent. Also, both List of All Elite Wrestling personnel and Template:All Elite Wrestling cover the current roster. A similar category was deleted in July 2024. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14#Category:WWE wrestlers for the details. Mann Mann (talk) 08:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, but expand to cover all past and present wrestlers. E.g. we have the category McDonald's people which covers everyone with an article who has ever worked for McDonald's. McPhail (talk) 09:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. A wrestling promotion =/= McDonald. Dozens of wrestlers and wrestling personalities have worked for AEW, and many of them just appeared in one match or dark matches. And don't forget cameo appearances. As I mentioned, the navbox and the list cover this topic. Plus List of former All Elite Wrestling personnel exists too. --Mann Mann (talk) 22:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Right, the McDonald's category contains people with a fulltime employment contract, that isn't a fair comparison. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and include all personnel. Tom Brady is in Category:New England Patriots players. This is how it is done across every other category in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not temporary.--User:Namiba 15:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps "Category:All Elite Wrestling people" would work better than "Category:All Elite Wrestling personnel", as "personnel" perhaps implies formal employment? McPhail (talk) 11:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Only AEW has that. No other wrestling company has a category like this. 96.253.56.249 (talk) 00:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Settlement of the pro-Japanese collaboration
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Settlement of the pro-Japanese collaboration to Category:Settlement of Korean collaborators with Imperial Japan
- Nominator's rationale: Not sure what the best name for this category is; it's currently grammatically incorrect, and doesn't match parent category Category:Korean collaborators with Imperial Japan. seefooddiet (talk) 18:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment, I removed Category:History of North Korea as a parent of this category since all content is related to South Korea. And I removed article Lim Heon-yong from this category since there is nothing about settlement in this article. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I do not see Marcocapelle's comment as opposing a rename; if anyone does oppose a rename please speak up :)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Alta California before 1824
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Alta California before 1824
Category:Online-only games
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Category:Online-only games
Category:Republican cities of Latvia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Republican cities of Latvia to Category:State cities of Latvia
- Nominator's rationale: rename, according to Administrative divisions of Latvia the correct name is state city. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 16:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chaoyang County
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Chaoyang County to Category:Chaoyang, Liaoning
- Nominator's rationale: Largely duplicative category containing a single article. Unhelpful for navigation. AusLondonder (talk) 15:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Skelton-in-Cleveland
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Skelton-in-Cleveland to Category:Redcar and Cleveland
- Nominator's rationale: Category containing only the main article and an article about a long-defunct railway station. Merging to parent is more suitable categorisation. AusLondonder (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Just delete, both articles are already in the tree of Category:Redcar and Cleveland. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've added a church and there is another at Commons:Category:All Saints' Church, Skelton in Cleveland that could probably have an article however although I don't think SMALLCAT would apply it might just be better to delete and re create later if necessary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Hatherleigh
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Hatherleigh to Category:Borough of West Devon
- Nominator's rationale: Category containing only the main article and an article about a long-defunct railway station. Merging to parent is more suitable categorisation. AusLondonder (talk) 14:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is a town not a village however its a small one of less than a thousand for the settlement and nearly 2 thousand for the parish. There are 91 listed buildings of which at least some such as the Grade I listed church probably qualifies for an article and there are 2 Grade II* buildings. I don't object to deletion as the author but I don't think WP:SMALLCAT would apply as there is scope for expansion but it might be better to just wait until we have more articles. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please review the purpose of categories. It'll help you craft better arguments. Mason (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Benwick
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Benwick to Category:Fenland District
- Nominator's rationale: Category containing only an article about a village already in the parent category and a defunct railway, better categorised in the parent. AusLondonder (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think WP:SMALLCAT would apply as its quite possible there will be other things in the parish that can have articles but it only has 1 listed building and if other things can be created it would probably be better to just wait until then and re create if necessary. Until April there was Benwick Parish Council but that probably doesn't need an article so merged made sense. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Small cat doesn't apply, but the convention has been that a single page isn't helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 02:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:MultiVersus characters
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: I feel like, unlike Category:Super Smash Bros. fighters, this category would not be considered WP:DEFINING for any of the characters involved. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, a cameo appearance is not defining. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Towns and villages in Latvia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Towns and villages in Latvia to Category:Populated places in Latvia
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with two (very obvious) subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - a distinction without a difference, as far as {{WP Cities}} is concerned. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 14:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merge. I have moved the "Towns" parents to the Towns subcat, and tidied up some interwiki links. – Fayenatic London 09:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Vehicle-building video games
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Vehicle-building video games to Category:Construction and management simulation games
- Nominator's rationale: I'm not getting much that confirms a "vehicle-building" genre really exists. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Secernentea
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Secernentea to Category:Nematodes
- Nominator's rationale: WoRMS and the article on Secernentea agree that this taxon is no longer in use. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:SubGenii by nationality
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:SubGenii by nationality to Category:SubGenii
- Nominator's rationale: Redudant category layer Mason (talk) 00:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete, not a defining characteristic of the subjects in the category. If not deleted, merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)- Comment. Deleting this category doesn't solve the problem, because this is a container category. It would just isolate the child categories. Mason (talk) 02:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are right, when I wrote the above I must have had the subcategory in mind. Then merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. Deleting this category doesn't solve the problem, because this is a container category. It would just isolate the child categories. Mason (talk) 02:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Hong Kong–Saudi Arabia relations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Hong Kong–Saudi Arabia relations to Category:China–Saudi Arabia relations
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. This category is extremely narrow intersection that really doesn't have sufficient pages to population it. (I looked) Mason (talk) 00:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per the recent developments. Srijanx22 (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's not a reason to keep a category. And it's non-responsive to the issue at hand. There's literally only one page in here, which is not helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 02:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Support" means the editor supports the nomination, not the category. – Fayenatic London 09:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Lol, that makes much more sense!SMasonGarrison 22:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Support" means the editor supports the nomination, not the category. – Fayenatic London 09:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's not a reason to keep a category. And it's non-responsive to the issue at hand. There's literally only one page in here, which is not helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 02:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. It would have been different if the article was about an event before 1997 but that is not the case. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per the above. The article (on a mosque) does not belong in other parents e.g. Category:Bilateral relations of Hong Kong. – Fayenatic London 09:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Films scored by Naved Parvez
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Thorough discussion; unlikely a WP:RELIST will help. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Naved Parvez was deleted in 2020. This category was created in 2024 and has 9 articles. I'm not sure if this category is needed as Parvez doesn't have an article. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support - The main article was deleted. The category must also go. Srijanx22 (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Question: wouldn't this be sufficient for a list? Marcocapelle (talk) 06:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Whether the article 'Naved Parvez' exists or not, this category is useful and does not have to be deleted. Tijd-jp (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I have added two more films that had been listed in the deleted article (these only name the composer as "Naved"). The article was deleted for being badly written as promotional (WP:G11) as well as non-notable (WP:A7). The latter may have been mistaken, as there were 11 citations, including Dhaka Tribune and Daily Sun in English. So a valid article could probably be written. The category includes a link to the Bengali Wikipedia page. – Fayenatic London 09:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.