Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 7

September 7

Category:Stinkers Bad Movie Award winning films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Thorough discussion; not likely a WP:RELIST will help (especially considering that most of the regulars have opined). HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a defining award Mason (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the film award is notable, see Stinkers Bad Movie Awards and 2006 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards. We aren't in the business of deciding what award is or is not worthwhile adding to a page or to a category, even if the award is for bad movie-making. That is basically censorship (see WP:NOTCENSORED), a policy, which outweighs the WP:OCAWARD argument below, which itself isn't strong, as almost all awards are non-defining, yet we include them. What we go by is notablitiy. If an award is notable, i.e. has an article, then we include the award in the article. When an award is included in the article, we also allow for categorizes to be added (when enough entries are available). Gonnym (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, my take is that most awards aren't defining. Regardless of whether the award is for good or less than good content. Mason (talk) 20:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep It was a very significant award. Especially for its time. Vinnylospo (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Don Young

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 15#Category:Don Young

Category:California winemakers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge to parent category. I understand that California has the most vineyards but I don't think we should defuse by state because of that. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge for now. Seems reasonable to me Mason (talk) 01:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:19th-century Kongo people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There's only one person across both of these centuries. I don't think that the Kongo people category tree is large enough to need diffusion by century Mason (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Suicides by carbon monoxide poisoning in Japan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Another WP:XY redirect which should be deleted. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Land disputes by country

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There are only two countries in here (and they're barely populated), which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Oils and fats technologies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Oils and fats technologies to Category:Oils
Nominator's rationale: Narrow itersection category with only one page in it. Mason (talk) 12:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chemical looping technologies

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 15#Category:Chemical looping technologies


Category:Lighthouses completed in the 2nd century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename and re-parent, one of the two lighthouses was completed in the 3rd century BC rather than in the 2nd century CE. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great suggestion! Support per nom Mason (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Medieval canals

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, these are all one- or two-article categories, this is not helpful for navigation. The 15th-century has only one merge target because the two articles are already in decade categories of transport infrastructure. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Archival technology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Feel free to reopen if I misread the room :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There's only one page in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 02:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Retailers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The term "Retailers" is too ambiguous; when I first saw it in Category:Retailing I assumed it was referring to people. But then I discovered that most of the subcats are for Retail companies. Thank goodness the editors who created those subcats had the good sense to use that term rather than "Retailers", so I don't think any of the subcats are in need of renaming. :) Anomalous+0 (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Numbers not in Wikidata

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 15#Category:The Numbers not in Wikidata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_7&oldid=1246846334"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 7, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.