Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 28

February 28

Category:Hercule Poirot (film series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Renaming of the article can be sorted out at WP:RM, and renaming of categories to match articles can be sorted out via WP:CFDS (specifically WP:C2D). House Blaster (talk • he/they) 03:19, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Hercule Poirot (film series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Scope duplictates existing category: Films based on Hercule Poirot books Northernhenge (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Northernhenge What do you mean? Other film series have their own categories. So, why not this one? Spectritus (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It’s just that I can’t see how this new one is different from the existing Category:Films based on Hercule Poirot books. If they’re different, so if they would have different contents, there isn’t a problem – it just needs explaining. —Northernhenge (talk) 22:27, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For example, are there films in the Hercule Poirot (film series) that are not based on any of the books? --Northernhenge (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's a difference. Category:Films based on Hercule Poirot books lists all the Hercule Poirot films, while Category:Hercule Poirot (film series) lists only films and soundtracks from the film series directed by Kenneth Branagh. Maybe it could be renamed to Category:Hercule Poirot (Kenneth Branagh film series) to avoid confusion. Spectritus (talk) 22:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- What precedent do we have, are there more examples of this sort of (what seems to be) duplication? Marcocapelle (talk) 22:46, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Marcocapelle If it can help you understand. For example, there could be a Category:Films based on Marvel Comics and a Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe films. You see the difference? Spectritus (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not asking what could be there but what is there. If we do not have anything else like this yet I do not think it is a good idea to start it. If we do have more, a group nomination would be desirable. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Films based on Marvel Comics has a subcategory Category:Films based on Marvel Comics by franchise, which has a number of subcategories:
- Kingsman (franchise) films
- Marvel Cinematic Universe films
- Sony's Spider-Man Universe films
so there is a precendent if we had something like Category:Films based on Hercule Poirot books by franchise with enough subcategories to make it worth having. I’m now veering from neutral towards ~~weak keep~~ (now rename – see below), provided there are enough film series/franchises to justify categorising films by franchise. --Northernhenge (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Northernhenge: so are you withdrawing the nomination? Marcocapelle (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  It certainly needed discussion. What’s come out so far is that it needs renaming (for example “Category:Hercule Poirot (Kenneth Branagh film series)”) and that there is a precedent in the “Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe films” categories. I don’t know if there are enough Poirot film series, and I don’t know if any series contains enough films to merit a category, but maybe that’s a discussion for another day, after any new categories have had a chance to grow. If this discussion has gone as far as it can, and if nobody is convinced we need to delete, then I’m prepared to withdraw the nomination. The renaming is important though. --Northernhenge (talk) 10:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  @Northernhenge: I agree. We could rename it. I can do it if you want. Spectritus (talk) 14:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  OK, please go ahead – I've striked (struck?) the nomination, which I think is the protocol for withdrawing it. Participants can't close it but hopefully someone will. It was a useful discussion. --Northernhenge (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  @Northernhenge: I can't do it. The move button doesn't appear. Spectritus (talk) 10:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Please do not move it, as the category should match the article Hercule Poirot (film series). If you believe they both should be moved then perhaps start a WP:RM at the article page. Also consider Hercule Poirot (2017 film series) rather than disambiguation by actor, per WP:NCFILM. --wooden superman 10:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  @Woodensuperman: Now, in case you've forgotten, Kenneth Branagh directed those films so I think Hercule Poirot (Kenneth Branagh film series) would be appropriate. However, I do not think the article needs moving since there aren't any articles about other Hercule Poirot film series. Spectritus (talk) 23:11, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  We disambiguate by year first, then by further disambiguator if necessary. There is no provision in WP:NCFILM to disambiguate by director or actor. A good example is Sherlock Holmes (1939 film series). However, if the article doesn't need moving, then neither does the category. --wooden superman 08:49, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I suppose this is settled then. Spectritus (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent)

Renaming to Hercule Poirot (2017 film series) looks good to me for the category (and the article, but this is CFD) per @Woodensuperman, not least so that readers know what they're looking at when the title comes up in a link or search. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) should take precedence here. --Northernhenge (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former commanderies of China in Korea

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Former commanderies of China in Korea to Category:Commanderies of China in Korea

Nominator's rationale: I'm not sure; is clarifying "former" needed for this? There are no commanderies of China in Korea rn. seefooddiet (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom, or possibly Category:Commanderies of China in the Korean peninsula because they weren't part of a Korean country. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In general, I think Korea-related categories use "Korea" as a region/culture name and not necessarily as a political entity. If we did do this there would be a multitude of other similar changes to make. seefooddiet (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former election commissions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Defunct election commissions. (non-admin closure) it's lio! | talk | work 06:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Former election commissions to Category:Defunct election commissions

Nominator's rationale: Not sure if this is the best move, but it matches formatting of other Category:Defunct government agencies by type seefooddiet (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fairfield Stags basketball venues

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Fairfield Stags basketball venues to Category:College basketball venues in Connecticut and Category:Fairfield Stags sports venues and Category:Fairfield Stags basketball

Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NARROWCAT User:Namiba 19:23, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Music videographies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Music videographies to Category:List of performances by entertainer in media

Nominator's rationale: The term videography is being misused in this case as the term is specific to work done by a videographer, and does not mean a list of videos or films (that use is a neologism original to wikipedia which should be edited out as unverifiable). Further, many of the individuals have entertainment credits in work other than video (such as computer games, discographies, acting credits for entertainers who do that as well as music, etc.) on these pages so the cat should reflect that by expanding the scope to all media to reflect the content across the lists. 4meter4 (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment When I created this category it was for articles like Michael Jackson videography, which are still named that. I don't think "performances by entertainer in media" is a very helpful, clear, or easy to use term. "Media" is way too broad a term and confusing. At least use something like "on screen" or similar. "Videography" is at least easy for a reader to understand what it is.★Trekker (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Such an undertaking would have been well served being discussed first before wholesale name changes to articles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Except the term "videography" does not mean a list of videos. Its use in that way is unique to wikipedia and is an unverifiable neologism not supported in sources outside of the encyclopedia. Per WP:NEO, the MJ article needs to be renamed, and the term videography needs to be removed when being used to refer to a video list in all articles across the encyclopedia as that is WP:OR. We can't just make up new definitions to words because it is convenient to do so. Additionally, most of these articles have media credits in a variety of media all on one page (TV, Film, music videos, streaming platforms, radio, computer games, etc.) and in multiple areas of creative contribution in over half of the cases (music performance credits, acting credits, dancing/choreography credits, directing credits, writing credits, producing credits, etc.) 4meter4 (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok this feels like a subject that maybe needs a broader discussion with several Wikipedia projects and input from many editors.★Trekker (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This impacts a lot of articles. I think a decision here to change the wording will need to result in a much bigger RfC.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 15:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rename, aligning with the article names, but "lists" instead of "list", and maybe drop "by entertainer". If this isn't clear as a category name then the article titles are equally unclear, so better change those to begin with. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
this is a much wider discussion as it also involves articles as well as categories. I'm fine with renaming, but what do we rename it to? Does such a categorization/classification (list of videos) even exist outside of Wikipedia? Perhaps the articles could be renamed to "list of videos by X", but what do we call the category? Video list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3family6 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's a requested move linked lower down at this page for Madonna videography and similar articles. Also, you didn't sign this comment, like the other one you made in the same edit. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. 1. The term "videography" has been used this way outside of Wikipedia. Here's a Cambridge University Press book: [1]. 2. Moreover, the term had been used before Wikipedia even existed, you can find some examples on Google Books. I've simply searched for "videography" and "discography" being used on one page, here's the results: [2].
If you don't like the term, I would suggest "filmography". But that would require reorganization of some lists, combining music videos and DVDs/BDs with films and TV series and documentaries and such. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Australian artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:26, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Australian artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Up-merge for now. 4meter4 (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not too small. Why not rename to Category:Lists of performances of Australian artists in media, aligned with the article titles? This also applies to the nominations below. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that.4meter4 (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not small. It contains six items which is enough. The same about other nominated categories. Eurohunter (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Five articles (and a redirect) is not a small category. This is perfectly reasonable. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 07:15, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per WP:OCLOCATION, non-defining intersection of discographies by nationality of subject. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 00:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose renaming. 1. The term "videography" has been used this way outside of Wikipedia. Here's a Cambridge University Press book: [3]. 2. Moreover, the term had been used before Wikipedia even existed, you can find some examples on Google Books. I've simply searched for "videography" and "discography" being used on one page, here's the results: [4].
If you don't like the term, I would suggest "filmography". But that would require reorganization of some lists, combining music videos and DVDs/BDs with films and TV series and documentaries and such. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Canadian artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:26, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Canadian artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Up-merge for now. 4meter4 (talk) 16:59, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See similar nomination above. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 07:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of American artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Lists of performances by American artists in media. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 03:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Videographies of American artists to Category:American filmographies

Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category of Category:American filmographies.4meter4 (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not against a rename but oppose the proposed merger. The content of the category have articles recently renamed from "Foo videography" to "List of performances by Foo in media". Then there's the whole scheme Category:Videographies by artist nationality, with each subcat being nominated individually. A consolidated request to rename along the lines of "Lists of performances by American artists in media" might be in order. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds reasonable. I'm not sure how to technically go about doing bundled nominations.4meter4 (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per above. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:30, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename which categories, to what? A list would be helpful for discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:44, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Videographies of American artists to Category:Lists of performances by American artists in media is the alternative proposal. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of YouTubers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Lists of YouTube videos. Beland (talk) 02:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of YouTubers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged; although I don't think these are technically videographies. 4meter4 (talk) 19:15, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that it is too small. If not merged, rename to Category:Lists of YouTube episodes by series or something like that, since that is the actual content. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:28, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rename?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All but one of the articles are categorized in Category:Lists of web series episodes, which seems sufficient to me, and the other (Videos by PewDiePie) I added to Category:Lists of YouTube videos. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:58, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars and 4meter4: at least it should be merged to Category:YouTube-related lists, shouldn't it? It wouldn't make sense to remove the articles from the YouTube tree while that still exists. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with a merge as long as we do not leave a redirect and the category is deleted.4meter4 (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Marcocapelle's recommendation to merge. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Category:Lists of YouTube videos per reasoning of Marcocapelle. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Greek artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Greek artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged. 4meter4 (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See similar nomination here. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Japanese artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Japanese artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be upmerged. 4meter4 (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See similar nomination here. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 15:00, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Lebanese artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Lebanese artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged for now, 4meter4 (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See similar nomination here. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Swedish artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Swedish artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged for now. 4meter4 (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See similar nomination here. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The small-cat nominations in this group should have been bundled.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Puerto Rican artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Puerto Rican artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat; should be up-merged to Category:Videographies for now 4meter4 (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See similar nomination here. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:08, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies of Filipino artists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies of Filipino artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small cat. Should be up-merged for now. 4meter4 (talk) 16:22, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See similar nomination here. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 23:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The category is not that small. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Videographies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 00:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Videographies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Videography is a technical term for the work done by a videographer. The cats here are not being used in this way; but are trying to turn "videography" into a word that means a list of videos as an original twist on the terms filmography/discography. This is a made up neologism that is far as I can tell is unique to who ever created these cats on wikipedia (there are also a bunch of articles titled with the term, and they should all be renamed). I've never seen "videography" used in this way anywhere else. Note I don't know how to bundle nom the sub cats, but all of these should be deleted. Likewise there are a bunch of article titles using this word that need renaming.4meter4 (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A large number of subcategories has been nominated on tomorrow's page. Shouldn't we wait for the outcome there? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting alongside some of the other discussions which attracted little participation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 00:00, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: At the Category:Music videographies, a point was raised that the issue needs discussion input from relevant WikiProjects, which I will do. Likely all of the nominations should have been bundled as well.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following WikiProjects have been notified: Film, Television, YouTube, Albums, and Songs. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Additionally, an RM has been opened at Talk:Madonna_videography#Requested_move_28_February_2025 about the page moves. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:10, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. 1. The term "videography" has been used this way outside of Wikipedia. Here's a Cambridge University Press book: [5]. 2. Moreover, the term had been used before Wikipedia even existed, you can find some examples on Google Books. I've simply searched for "videography" and "discography" being used on one page, here's the results: [6].
If you don't like the term, I would suggest "filmography". But that would require reorganization of some lists, combining music videos and DVDs/BDs with films and TV series and documentaries and such. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Artists by populated place in Cambridgeshire

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge. Apparently this is a duplicate of Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_22#English_artists_by_populated_place, which I closed as merge. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Cambridgeshire to Category:Artists from Cambridgeshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Cheshire to Category:Artists from Cheshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Derbyshire to Category:Artists from Derbyshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Devon to Category:Artists from Devon and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Dorset to Category:Artists from Dorset and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in the East Riding of Yorkshire to Category:Artists from the East Riding of Yorkshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in East Sussex to Category:Artists from East Sussex and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Essex to Category:Artists from Essex and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Gloucestershire to Category:Artists from Gloucestershire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Greater Manchester to Category:Artists from Greater Manchester and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Hampshire to Category:Artists from Hampshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Kent to Category:Artists from Kent and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Lancashire to Category:Artists from Lancashire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Leicestershire to Category:Artists from Leicestershire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Lincolnshire to Category:Artists from Lincolnshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Merseyside to Category:Artists from Merseyside and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Norfolk to Category:Artists from Norfolk and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in North Yorkshire to Category:Artists from North Yorkshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Northamptonshire to Category:Artists from Northamptonshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Nottinghamshire to Category:Artists from Nottinghamshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Shropshire to Category:Artists from Shropshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Somerset to Category:Artists from Somerset and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Staffordshire to Category:Artists from Staffordshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Suffolk to Category:Artists from Suffolk and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Surrey to Category:Artists from Surrey and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Tyne and Wear to Category:Artists from Tyne and Wear and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in the West Midlands (county) to Category:Artists from the West Midlands (county) and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in West Yorkshire to Category:Artists from West Yorkshire and Category:English artists by populated place
Propose merging Category:Artists by populated place in Worcestershire to Category:Artists from Worcestershire and Category:English artists by populated place

Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intermediate levels that are all sparsely populated. Recommended by Marcocapelle (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_February_20#Category:Artists_by_populated_place_in_England_by_county. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, same as in earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:02, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No action - Closing this to allow for a follow-up nomination at editorial discretion, presumably following the discussion below. With that in mind, I'm not removing the existing tags, since they can be changed for the new nomination. (Perhaps someone with automated tools can help with that.) - jc37 22:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose splitting Category: Cycle racing in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Cycle racing in British Overseas Territories and Category: Cycle racing in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Defunct airlines of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Defunct airlines of British Overseas Territories and Category: Defunct airlines of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Demographics of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Demographics of British Overseas Territories and Category: Demographics of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Disasters in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Disasters in British Overseas Territories and Category: Disasters in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Disease outbreaks in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Disease outbreaks in British Overseas Territories and Category: Disease outbreaks in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Expatriate sportspeople from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Expatriate sportspeople from British Overseas Territories and Category: Expatriate sportspeople from the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Expatriates from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Expatriates from British Overseas Territories and Category: Expatriates from the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Films set in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Films set in British Overseas Territories and Category: Films set in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Foreign relations of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Foreign relations of British Overseas Territories and Category: Foreign relations of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Fortifications in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Fortifications in British Overseas Territories and Category: Fortifications in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Forts in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Forts in British Overseas Territories and Category: Forts in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Gambling companies of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Gambling companies of British Overseas Territories and Category: Gambling companies of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Girls' schools in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Girls' schools in British Overseas Territories and Category: Girls' schools in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Health disasters in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Health disasters in British Overseas Territories and Category: Health disasters in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Historic sites in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Historic sites in British Overseas Territories and Category: Historic sites in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Immigrants to British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Immigrants to British Overseas Territories and Category: Immigrants to the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Infrastructure in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Infrastructure in British Overseas Territories and Category: Infrastructure in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Islam in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Islam in British Overseas Territories and Category: Islam in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Jews and Judaism in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Jews and Judaism in British Overseas Territories and Category: Jews and Judaism in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Languages of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Languages of British Overseas Territories and Category: Languages of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Law enforcement agencies of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Law enforcement agencies of British Overseas Territories and Category: Law enforcement agencies of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: National sports teams of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:National sports teams of British Overseas Territories and Category: National sports teams of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Novels set in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Novels set in British Overseas Territories and Category: Novels set in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: People from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies by descent to Category:People from British Overseas Territories and Category: People from the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Police forces of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Police forces of British Overseas Territories and Category: Police forces of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Ports and harbours of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Ports and harbours of British Overseas Territories and Category: Ports and harbours of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Protected areas of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Protected areas of British Overseas Territories and Category: Protected areas of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Public transport in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Public transport in British Overseas Territories and Category: Public transport in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Radio stations in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Radio stations in British Overseas Territories and Category: Radio stations in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Service industries in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Service industries in British Overseas Territories and Category: Service industries in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Shipping companies of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Shipping companies of British Overseas Territories and Category: Shipping companies of the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Sixth form colleges in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Sixth form colleges in British Overseas Territories and Category: Sixth form colleges in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Sports in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies by year to Category:Sports in British Overseas Territories and Category: Sports in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Tourism in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Tourism in British Overseas Territories and Category: Tourism in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Tourist attractions in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Tourist attractions in British Overseas Territories and Category: Tourist attractions in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Transport infrastructure in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Transport infrastructure in British Overseas Territories and Category: Transport infrastructure in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Video games set in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Video games set in British Overseas Territories and Category: Video games set in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category: Works set in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Works set in British Overseas Territories and Category: Works set in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category:British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies at multi-sport events to Category: British Overseas Territories at multi-sport events and Category:Crown Dependencies at multi-sport events
Propose splitting Category:British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies in fiction to Category: British Overseas Territories in fiction and Category:Crown Dependencies in fiction
Propose splitting Category:Castles in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Castles in British Overseas Territories and Category: Castles in the Crown Dependencies
Propose splitting Category:Communications in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Communications in British Overseas Territories and Category: Communications in the Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies-related lists
Propose deleting Category: Companies of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Cricket in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Culture of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Defunct companies of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Defunct sports competitions in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Economy of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Education in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Elections in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Environment of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Expatriate sportspeople in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Expatriates in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies by nationality
Propose deleting Category: Expatriates in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Fauna of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Ferry companies of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Ferry transport in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Football in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Football venues in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Geography of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Geology of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Government in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Governors of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Health in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: History of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: History of sport in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Important Bird Areas of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Islands of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Jews from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Landforms of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Lighthouses in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Museums in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: People from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies by occupation
Propose deleting Category: People from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies by religion
Propose deleting Category: People from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Political office-holders by British Overseas Territory or Crown Dependency
Propose deleting Category: Political parties in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Politicians by British Overseas Territory or Crown Dependency
Propose deleting Category: Politics of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Populated places in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Protestantism in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Protestants from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Referendums in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Religion in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Religious buildings and structures in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Roman Catholic churches in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Roman Catholics from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Rugby union in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Schools in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Science and technology in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Secondary schools in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Society of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Sport in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies by sport
Propose deleting Category: Sport in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Sports clubs and teams in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Sports competitions in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Sports organisations of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Sports venues in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Sportspeople from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Transport in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Water transport in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category: Years in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Airlines of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Airports in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Anglicanism in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Athletics (track and field) venues in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Athletics in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Aviation in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Basketball in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Biota of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Borders of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Buildings and structures in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Cathedrals in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Catholic Church in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Christianity in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Christians from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Churches in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose deleting Category:Squash in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies
Propose renaming Category: Ferries of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category: Ferries of the Crown Dependencies
Propose renaming Category: Fictional people from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category: Fictional people from the Crown Dependencies
Propose renaming Category: Government-owned companies of British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category: Government-owned companies of the Crown Dependencies
Propose renaming Category: Mosques in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Mosques in British Overseas Territories
Propose renaming Category: Musicals set in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Musicals set in British Overseas Territories
Propose renaming Category: Plays set in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Plays set in British Overseas Territories
Propose renaming Category: Presbyterianism in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Presbyterianism in British Overseas Territories
Propose renaming Category: Scientists from British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Scientists from British Overseas Territories
Propose renaming Category:Boys' schools in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category: Boys' schools in the Crown Dependencies
Propose renaming Category:Comics set in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Comics set in British Overseas Territories
Propose renaming Category:Synagogues in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to Category:Synagogues in British Overseas Territories

Nominator's rationale: split (or if the split already exists then delete, or if there is no content for either British Overseas Territories or Crown Dependencies then rename), these are two entirely unrelated topics. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, the two groups aren't entirely unrelated, although they are distinct. They could be unbundled, but wouldn't this simply create a whole slew of small categories, with little navigational benefit? Whether they're bundled or unbundled, the utility to the reader seems mostly similar. CMD (talk) 14:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a follow-up nomination for a number of categories will be necessary, proposing to merge to the then remaining parents. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose, although open to constructive discussion. These categories are useful for putting together content for the British Overseas, in a similar fashion than for Overseas France, the Dutch Caribbean or the insular areas of the United States. All of the previous also gather territories with different legal statuses, sometimes very different. These territories are both (A) under British sovereignty and (B) not part of the United Kingdom proper, so I'd say they are not unrelated. When sorting content by country/dependent territory, the parent sovereignty is probably worth considering at least as much as the individual legal status of the territory, and is therefore a more efficient and defining way to categorize content. Place Clichy (talk) 08:56, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I'd be surprised if I wasn't the creator of at least one of these categories, and I did not receive any notification about this discussion. Place Clichy (talk) 09:01, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, I agree with Place Clichy's comments. These are not "entirely unrelated topics" and I don't understand the benefit of splitting them. Also, I did create one these categories and I'm pretty sure I didn't get any notification. DB1729^talk 03:34, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Marcocapelle, Place Clichy, and DB1729: Would renaming to Category:Dependent territories of the United Kingdom, etc. to match Dependent territories of the United Kingdom be a reasonable alternative? Stating "Foo in X and Y" is not a great structure IMO; better to state what the defining part of that intersection actually is. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why not in theory, but as the introduction of that article states, it is quite confusing that British Dependent Territories was the legal name of the British Overseas Territories from 1981 to 2002. British Dependent Territories redirects there. Place Clichy (talk) 23:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as there exist no British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies and limited use elsewhere. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question @Kaffet i halsen, Marcocapelle, Place Clichy, DB1729, and Aidan721: I attempted to close this discussion and encountered some complexity; I think it would be good to clarify before putting in a lot of work, and we may need a new set of nominations. It sounds like Category:Dependent territories of the United Kingdom is preferred over Category:British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies? We could rename all subcategories to match, but this would still leave a bit of a mess. There are a lot of "Category:Foo in BOTs and CDs" which have children patterned "Category:Foo in BOTs", "Category:Foo in CDs", and "Category:Foo subtopic in BOTs and CDs". Often there are simply "Category:Foo in TERRITORY NAME" subcategories under those. Given that there are only three Crown Dependencies, merging Category:British Overseas Territories and Category:Crown Dependencies into Category:Dependent territories of the United Kingdom would be feasible, and doing the same for all subcategories would eliminate a lot of not-very-helpful layers of this category onion. So my question: is the "full merge" option preferable to the "rename only" option in which we have a status quo of mixed split/combined? Also wondering if the "full merge" option is either preferable or acceptable to those expressing support for the "full split" option? -- Beland (talk) 08:29, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If a full split isn't within reach, a full merge is a second best option. At least we will then avoid or reduce a lot of binary subcategorization. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:37, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't they already merged? CMD (talk) 13:05, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Chipmunkdavis: No; for example, we have both Category:Buildings and structures in British Overseas Territories and Category:Buildings and structures in the Crown Dependencies. Under the "full merge" idea, these would both be merged into Category:Buildings and structures in British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, and that would be renamed to Category:Buildings and structures in dependent territories of the United Kingdom. Then the same with subcategories Category:Sports venues in British Overseas Territories and Category:Sports venues in the Crown Dependencies, etc. -- Beland (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A merge seems best, the vast majority of "X in the Crown Dependencies" categories are going to consist of a maximum 3 subcats. CMD (talk) 04:14, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree a "full merge" of the intermediate layers "Foo in the BOTs" and "Foo in the CDs" would be an improvement. However, I still believe that the current title is better than using Dependent territories of the United Kingdom, because that is not an established term and it is easily confused with British Dependent Territories, which is a different thing. Place Clichy (talk) 01:40, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Place Clichy: Does that mean Dependent territories of the United Kingdom should be renamed? It seems there is a rule that category and article names should follow the same pattern. -- Beland (talk) 07:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
C2D is a suggestion, not a rule (see also WP:5P5). In its present state, Dependent territories of the United Kingdom is hardly an article, and would be a very poor suggestion for a primary topic. It is a vague undefined notion, that includes other past statuses such as British Dependent Territories or Crown colonies. I'm certainly not suggesting that this article should be renamed, although it could be is someone were to suggest another name for it, such as (tongue in cheek) why not rump British Empire. Place Clichy (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, British dependent territories redirects to Dependent territories of the United Kingdom. I've added a hatnote on British Overseas Territories for anyone who has arrived in the wrong place due to capitalization.
If I'm understanding correctly, Kaffet i halsen objects that "British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies" is also not a commonly used phrase and does not correspond to an article. The possibility of confusion of "British Dependent Territories" with "Dependent territories of the United Kingdom" seems low, given the latter doesn't have the word "British" and is not fully capitalized. I think it's pretty clear that it's generic, and we do create generic phrases to categorize things sometimes even if they aren't established phrases.
As for renaming, we could say "Dependencies of the United Kingdom", which is shorter. It shares a word with "Crown Dependencies", so there's a possibility of confusion there, but it likewise seems low. The consequences of confusion are also low - anyone ending up at "Dependent territories of the United Kingdom" will quickly see the British Overseas Territories and the Crown Dependencies if they were looking for one or the other. I like "Dependent territories of the United Kingdom" because it clarifies that it concerns territories (not, I dunno, legal dependencies or some sort of social welfare), and as a generic assures the reader that there isn't some third category of external territory out there that is for some reason listed separately.
@Aidan721: Are you persuaded that "Dependent territories of the United Kingdom" is too confusing?
To avoid conflicting CFD tags and properly notify category creators, my plan is to close this nomination as "keep" and open a new one implementing the "full merge" option to make sure there is consensus for that, including choice of base name. -- Beland (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
New discussion is at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 29#British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies upmerge. -- Beland (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons directors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons directors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT --wooden superman 15:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Nonsensical rationale. Dimadick (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is it nonsensical? This is exactly what WP:PERFCAT is for. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 February 16#TV directors by series as precedent. --wooden superman 15:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, perhaps unless we get an explanation why it is nonsensical. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Listify/Delete per previous discussion, noted above. I didn't check every entry, but it looks like there is an already-existing list at Warner_Bros._Cartoons#Directors. - jc37 17:29, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons music composers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons music composers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT --wooden superman 15:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Nonsensical rationale. Dimadick (talk) 15:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is it nonsensical? This is exactly what WP:PERFCAT is for. See this discussion regarding crew. --wooden superman 15:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as above. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Listify/Delete per previous discussion, noted above. I didn't check every entry, but it looks like there is an already-existing list at Warner_Bros._Cartoons#Music. - jc37 17:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:I Can See Your Voice contestants

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Beland (talk) 02:46, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:I Can See Your Voice contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:I Can See Your Voice (American game show) contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:I Can See Your Voice (British game show) contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:I Can See Your Voice Thailand contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:I Can See Your Voice (South Korean game show) contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Veo cómo cantas (Mexican game show) contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:I Can See Your Voice (German game show) contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Gvachvene sheni khma contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:I Can See Your Voice (Chinese game show) contestants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: These people are already well known. This is nothing more than a WP:PERFCAT. --wooden superman 13:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:08, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retain them. Pinging @Woodensuperman, Aidan721, Marcocapelle — These categories are literally meant to be reserved for mystery singers and contestants to appear on I Can See Your Voice and its international franchise. As you know, certain mystery singers such as Marius Bear, Hwang Chi-yeul, and Ant Nurhan actually first discovered through the show itself. Aside from that, re-discovered acts such as Maytree should be included on these latter categories. Saisønisse (talk) 22:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Woodensuperman, Aidan721, Marcocapelle — Also, these categories should be put in a similar behavior to that of Category:Big Brother (franchise) contestants and Category:Survivor (franchise) contestants, due to its unique "mystery music game show" genre. Saisønisse (talk) 23:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- How does this counter the fact that it is not a defining characteristic? The article Marius Bear does not even mention "I can see your voice" in the body text. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)80[reply]
  Pinging @Woodensuperman, Aidan721, Marcocapelle — So you're mentioning Marius Bear on (the German 1st season of) I Can See Your Voice like these?

Saisønisse (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not deny he was in the show. I am just saying that it is apparently not important enough to mention in the article. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Arab descent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Spanish people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Hong Kong people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Peruvian people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Algerian people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Colombian people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Danish people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:German people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Italian people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Japanese people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Swedish people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Somali people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Serbian people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Propose deleting Category:Uruguayan people of Arab descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Small categories. In all these cases, the "nationality descent" categories are already present and are more suitable than "ethnic descent." Note that I did not nominate the general Category:People of Arab descent. Hassan697 (talk) 13:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Selectively merge to Category:People of Arab descent. Note that many articles do not mention Arab descent, they should be purged. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:13, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have already merged them manually Hassan697 (talk) 09:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, in that case deletion can go ahead as nominated. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as per nom. LibStar (talk) 05:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. In this case, Arab descent is wrongly used as a container for countries in which all people are not Arab, such as Lebanon or Egypt. Arab ethnic categories should only be used for individual people for which reliable sources specifically support an Arab identity. There are previous discussion that clearly establish precedent, but I don't have a link right now. Place Clichy (talk) 09:07, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Short stories set in the Middle Ages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Short stories set in the 10th century (1 P) to Category:Works set in the 10th century and Category:Short stories set in the Middle Ages
Propose merging Category:Short stories set in the 11th century (2 P) to Category:Works set in the 11th century and Category:Short stories set in the Middle Ages
Propose merging Category:Short stories set in the 12th century (1 P) to Category:Works set in the 12th century and Category:Short stories set in the Middle Ages

Nominator's rationale: merge, mostly only 1 or 2 articles per century, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Tang dynasty short stories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Short stories set in the 8th century (6 P) to Category:Fiction set in 8th-century Tang dynasty
Propose merging Category:Short stories set in the 9th century (1 P) to Category:Fiction set in 9th-century Tang dynasty

Nominator's rationale: merge, for consistency, until the 12th century the tree of short stories by century of setting mostly contains only 1 or 2 articles per century (see discussion above) which is not helpful for navigation. The 8th century is merely an accidental exception. The articles in these categories happen to be all set in China during the Tang dynasty, hence these particular merge targets. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons voice actors

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Warner Bros. Cartoons voice actors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT --wooden superman 10:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:06, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Nonsensical rationale. Dimadick (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is it nonsensical? Acting in a series of Warner Brothers Cartoons is absolutely textbook WP:PERFCAT. --wooden superman 15:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Listify/Delete per nom. I didn't check every entry, but it looks like there is an already-existing list at Warner_Bros._Cartoons#Voices. - jc37 17:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Inverse Phase albums

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Inverse Phase albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Both entries are redirects to the band. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 09:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nothing to see here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Seminole freedmen

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:46, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Seminole freedmen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: delete, only one article of which this is not even a defining characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Billy Bowlegs III was not a freedman and should be recategorized as Category:Black Seminole people. Yuchitown (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Slavery of Native Americans

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 17#Category:Slavery of Native Americans

Category:Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi alumni

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deleting Category:Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi alumni (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Recently created 1-article category, categorized to itself. Gjs238 (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now, this is not helpful for navigation, without objection to recreation when some more articles are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. LibStar (talk) 09:49, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deaths by firearm in Norfolk Island

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Deaths by firearm in Australia. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Category:Deaths by firearm in Norfolk Island to Category:Death in Norfolk Island

Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry, also merge with Category:Deaths by firearm in Australia. LibStar (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, but to Category:Deaths by firearm in Australia. Deaths categories are supposed to be container categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
support single merge to Category:Deaths by firearm in Australia. LibStar (talk) 05:55, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.