Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2008 May 14/Articles

Articles

Please note that multiple passages are lifted from different sources. This was just the most troubling. Sur de Filadelfia (talk) 14:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This author's initial complaint, appropriately on the article's talk page, concerned re-use of Wikipedia material in a different article [2], which he described as "plagiarism or a copyright violation." Other editors, including me, tried to explain the relevant Wikipedia policies. Now he is claiming a different copyvio because I included a one-paragraph summary of information from a much longer news article, a summary that is IMO fair use. Could some admin please clear this up? betsythedevine (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you go throught the article, sentence by sentence, you'll see a bunch of material lifted from other parts of the internet. The New York Times article is just one citable source. Let an admin decide. Sur de Filadelfia (talk) 01:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No copyvio detected to the cited article. I randomly popped in on several sentences and found no duplication except to Wikipedia mirrors. In the absence of evidence, this resolves as no problem. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2008 May 14/Articles, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.